Pip Accumulator EA

[⭐ pipmaster]

I have to say I've tried this EA and doesn't seem safe at all. It always seems to lose for me. Since putting it on have just had losses. I'm not selling this but I bought Million Dollar Pips using 1.2 with 5% risk. Rarely trades and have had only small losses in comparison to wins. Last friday on 0.25 made around $350. Then last night made another $400 or so. I've only had losses with this EA if anyone had any thoughts or a set file would be appreciated.

[hermes]

pipmaster how about to pip the Million Dollar Pips to me for demo testing. The small losses are results of good MM because then come occasionally big wins which count. The PIP ACCU EA didn't work for me also but the manual trading with support of some indicators is successful.

Hermes

[chromeie]

I have to say I've tried this EA and doesn't seem safe at all. It always seems to lose for me. Since putting it on have just had losses. I'm not selling this but I bought Million Dollar Pips using 1.2 with 5% risk. Rarely trades and have had only small losses in comparison to wins. Last friday on 0.25 made around $350. Then last night made another $400 or so. I've only had losses with this EA if anyone had any thoughts or a set file would be appreciated.

 

mdp is suck.

i also earn lot of pips on that friday, using ibfx (high spread)

 

but how overall result ? profit ? loss ?

dont try look for vps which have low spread and high connection, it doesn't effect.

 

this thread is discuss pip accumulator not mdp. STOP say your mdp result here.

[blackdiamon]

add

int timeframe = Period();
   int dtime = iTime(NULL, timeframe, 0);
   int shift = iBarShift(NULL, 0, dtime - 60 * timeframe, FALSE);

 

and replaces CandleNo by shift

[soundfx]

Guys,

 

I'm too busy with other stuff these days to spend much time on II, however I keep reading posts from folks saying things like "pip acumulator EA is rubbish...XXXX EA is much better" etc.

 

Jeez - will you guys ever learn lol.

 

I've pointed out several times that PIPA EA was meant to be a joint effort from II members to create a publicly available EA for the benefit of all which is based on a sound and profitable manual trading system.

 

There's been little sign of any real interest in developing an EA which will make profits for all, though there are far too many people who are locked into the "testing commercial systems" frame of mind rather than the " we could create something phenomenal" state of mind.

 

As I said at the start of the thread, I gave everyone a golden opportunity to help in developing an EA which would be something special. There have been lots of helpful suggestions along the way from non-programmers which is always appreciated, however it only takes a couple of minutes to write down your thoughts, whereas it can take several hours/days or even weeks to create program code which works in the way you want (and there don't seem to be any coders here who are interested :( ).

 

I think that my original experiment in truly joint collaboration has failed. I'm not really disappointed because I expected this to happen.

 

Feel free to kill off this thread totally and carry on talking about MDP or some other commercial EA lol.

[JasonKwok]

"pip acumulator EA is rubbish...XXXX EA is much better" .....I'm not really disappointed because I expected this to happen.

 

yeah, I agreed with SoundFX. What we have witnessed is part of the amateur's mentality. When one EA failed, they said another EA better and they will drop this EA and move on to another, when this EA started to perform again, they returned and ask for settings, time frame, time to watch for trade etc etc...they simply too lazy to spend time testing and analyzing the results. They simply waiting for someone to place the "food" on their plate.

 

Many amateur traders are still searching for the Holy Grail where they expect an EA to win 100% of the trades and not losing a single trade, some could not even tolerate break-even trades. Some can tolerate losing trade but the daily overall result must still be a win. If you have sound money management and still afraid to see one losing trade, you better off putting the money with a bank or buying your own Govt bonds.

 

I always believe that good trading result is first based on return of hard work before you can count the return on capital. I've done my due diligent and now trading live with this EA, of course, with some modifications. This EA has locked 300 pips of profit on EURUSD.

 

I'm always grateful to SoundFX who has converted the manual system into this EA. You helped me to save plenty of hours to understand the codes in the original indicators file. I'm new to coding indicator files but I will learn.

 

Thanks SoundFX.

Edited November 1, 2011 by JasonKwok

[Scalper72]

here is a posibility set for this specific great EA ;)

 

Currency: GBP/USD

TImeFrame: M5

EA: IIPipa 2.01a

 

load this set-file. http://www.multiupload.com/ULH9334QFA

 

..further im usin separate trailing EA which much more fine tuning.

 

dont hold ur breath buddys :D

 

 

http://s14.directupload.net/images/111101/vktbrplt.gif

 

here is a trade .. check the different between EA and manual System

 

http://s14.directupload.net/images/111101/fbh259ny.gif

http://s7.directupload.net/images/111101/5hjjm96b.gif

 

 

 

i hope to make my small contribution for u..

 

Good Luck

Edited November 1, 2011 by Scalper72

[fx4_ever]

Hi;

I am also trying to fine tune settings and still checking out the difference between v1 and v2. To me, v1 is more close to the original manual system than v2. I am not quite sure yet what is the difference and why is the reason that v2 got changed. Also, noticed that some of functions that v1 doesn't work. i.e trailing, etc.

Using Mangiare' MACD box settings to 20/100/18 on 1 hr TF, back test seem to hold pretty well. More people test to find optimal settings will be helpful to those who can't stay up and trade manually.

 

I've change the code slightly and if anyone interested in trying on forward test and post here, you are welcome to it. I made a comparison between v2 and v1 and used some of the code from v2 to v1. However, I am not coder and don't know much about coding. (just enough to be dangerious. :-O ) SO PLEASE PLEASE DO NOT USE IT ON LIVE UNTIL YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY SURE. EVEN THEN, PLEASE SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADV BEFORE YOU USE IT ON LIVE. SERIOUSLY!

 

Test time frame: 1 hr

 

back test graph image:

http://i43.tinypic.com/23u7yb8.gif

 

back test statement:

http://www.4shared.com/document/vtGExAHy/v10_1hr_test.html?

http://www.4shared.com/photo/elFxfMpu/v10_1hr_test.html?

 

EA

http://www.4shared.com/file/DrFXVdMU/_SRL__PA_v102.html?

 

Set file:

http://www.4shared.com/file/N89dfRkK/pa_v12_1hr.html?

[hermes]

On what pair do you test?

Thanks Hermes

[fx4_ever]

On what pair do you test?

Thanks Hermes

 

Posted results were from EURUSD.

 

I am also forward testing on 1 hr TF, and also on 5min TF with different TP . I will have to wait and see what would be the target that I can reasonably go for it. These things takes time, but I think this has merit and worth the effort to fine tune it.

 

PS: I am forward testing on 6 pairs (US majors) eur, gbp, chf, cad, aud, nzd.

Edited November 2, 2011 by fx4_ever

[hermes]

I like the 1H strategy better. Will be less noise.

Hermes

[chromeie]

Hi:

 

How was your trade overnight? I tried with your settings with v1.0.1 on Hot Forex demo account, it keep hitting SL. Also, I noticed that even though MasterProb set to 20 and -20, it opens arbitrarily. So, I switch back to v2 and not having option to entered on arrow's only, DD is hard to control. So, I am concluded that unless EA can be monitor with some way to filter out for the entries at near support/resistance area and option of entering on arrow only, only way to trade this strategy with EA is manually use it 'as a tool', rather than Automated Trading. Too bad...

 

Image below is where order was opened when masterProb wasn't 20/-20. Also, it opens when arrow wasn't even there. So, v1.0.1, open on "arrowonly" doesn't seem to work, unless I am missing something entirely. Green Arrow is the one from the PipAccum. - don't pay attention to other arrows.

 

http://i51.tinypic.com/52n8n6.png

 

what is master pro ?

[JasonKwok]

Guys, before you test on the lower time frame, please understand that the trigger or signal is generated by slow MACD with settings 24,52,18. Slow MACD works well on higher time frame like H1, H4 and above, for trending pair like EURUSD.

 

That is why in manual system, the creator recommended time frame H1 and above.

 

As mentioned earlier in this thread, I used it on H1 and modified the first version of the EA with SL and TP to be exactly the same as recommended by the original creator.

 

Thanks FX4_Ever for running the back test. Your back test result has added my confidence in this system.

[LukeB]

Not sure which ST indy everyone is using, but this one is MTF Non repainting Supertrend

 

Probably better to use this one if including into an EA.

 

http://www.multiupload.com/5EVYRKT8GN

 

I'm not sure the Supertrend indicator here is good, or at least, it seems to do a lot of extra work.

I believe it loops through the entire history of bars with every tick. Also, I'd like to get comments or explanation of what is going on in PlotPoint and CleanPoint.

Anyway, here it is re-written to display in its own window, and to show the four buffer values for the last four bars.

 

http://www.multiupload.com/IEPZJO0YAR

 

Any help cleaning it up / explaining what is going on appreciated - or if there are references to versions that may be better.

Edited December 6, 2011 by LukeB

[JasonKwok]

I'm not sure the Supertrend indicator here is good, or at least, it seems to do a lot of extra work.

I believe it loops through the entire history of bars with every tick.

 

since almost every indicators are derived from prices, it will loop through the history bars to compute the current value. since we are on this EA thread, you can use iCustom function to retrieve the value and use it for SL.

 

SuperTrend is good for riding the trend because when the price flatten after strong move, itself will flatten too, giving room for price to volatile. But if the price reverse, we would stop out at smaller profit compared to using PSAR, which will move closer to the price even when price has flattened.

 

You may consider using PSAR to take partial profit and trail the remaining lots with SuperTrend.

[robotfx2]

what the meaning if i get this:

 

On EURUSD

2011.12.28 14:37:20 II_PIPA_EA-2_01 EURUSD,H1: GBPUSD Sell Trail error(130): invalid stops TrailStop = 1.3086

2011.12.28 14:37:14 II_PIPA_EA-2_01 EURUSD,H1: GBPUSD Sell Trail error(130): invalid stops TrailStop = 1.3085

 

On GBPUSD

2011.12.28 14:40:32 II_PIPA_EA-2_01 EURUSD,H1: GBPUSD Sell Trail error(130): invalid stops TrailStop = 1.3084

 

How to fix this error ???

Edited December 28, 2011 by robotfx2

[JasonKwok]

Error code 130 refer to invalid stop price. Check the stop price that you want to set is not within the stop/limit imposed by the broker.

Another possibility is the SL price is on the wrong side. if you using SuperTrend for trailing, the SuperTrend may not have crossed side.

Edited December 28, 2011 by JasonKwok

[Aviz]

can any one please upload all the ver for this EA, as i lost because my system crash and i dont have any backup :(

[BobR]

Here's everything I have. It's probably only the very first version. Still, better than nothing I suppose.

 http://www.mediafire.com/?qyigrjf3f09q1yb 

[alaki]

Hi;

I am also trying to fine tune settings and still checking out the difference between v1 and v2. To me, v1 is more close to the original manual system than v2. I am not quite sure yet what is the difference and why is the reason that v2 got changed. Also, noticed that some of functions that v1 doesn't work. i.e trailing, etc.

Using Mangiare' MACD box settings to 20/100/18 on 1 hr TF, back test seem to hold pretty well. More people test to find optimal settings will be helpful to those who can't stay up and trade manually.

 

I've change the code slightly and if anyone interested in trying on forward test and post here, you are welcome to it. I made a comparison between v2 and v1 and used some of the code from v2 to v1. However, I am not coder and don't know much about coding. (just enough to be dangerious. :-O ) SO PLEASE PLEASE DO NOT USE IT ON LIVE UNTIL YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY SURE. EVEN THEN, PLEASE SEEK PROFESSIONAL ADV BEFORE YOU USE IT ON LIVE. SERIOUSLY!

 

Test time frame: 1 hr

 

back test graph image:

http://i43.tinypic.com/23u7yb8.gif

 

back test statement:

http://www.4shared.com/document/vtGExAHy/v10_1hr_test.html?

http://www.4shared.com/photo/elFxfMpu/v10_1hr_test.html?

 

EA

http://www.4shared.com/file/DrFXVdMU/_SRL__PA_v102.html?

 

Set file:

http://www.4shared.com/file/N89dfRkK/pa_v12_1hr.html?

 

Can you please upload the files again?