Sneed

I was not able to locate the GMT offset in these settings. Since this EA trades only during certain times, it would make sense to have a GMT offset, since it does not have "autodetect" GMT. Was it designed for only brokers with a specific GMT offset? :-/

Alpati UK backtest H1 2010.08.02 - 2010.09.01:

 

http://www.multiupload.com/SLF25144Z4

 

set:

 

http://www.multiupload.com/WNSRSGNHDX

I always wondered how that worked. The Bulletproof EXE installation file is 1046KB, which must include both the EX4 file and a DLL file. Now, I compare that with a "regluar" EA, that also uses an EXE installation file, NoName EA (which is the actual name of the EA), and that EA has a EXE installation file size of 1118KB. So, why would the BulletProof installation file be SMALLER, than a "cheap" EA installation file? :(

they tell their ea have 4000 line of code, and only 1238 line of code to see when i decompile it. my ea have 2011 line of code and he is not finish, another pure scam, just my 10 cent comment

Well, they didn't tell "me" that.

When I purchased FapTurbo, they assured me "multiple times" in writing that they used the "default" settings. And that their performance was better than mine because we used different brokers. Then when I used their broker, and still didn't match their performance, support "stopped" answering my emails. It is good you got a refund anyway, because "their" version of the software only allows you to use it on 1 account. And when I took it off one broker and tried to "transfer" my license to another broker, they told me that I had to "close" my account with the first broker, and send proof. But, this didn't make sense to me because I was still using the first broker with other EA's and didn't want to close the account. They then told me that I had to purchase "another" license, even though I removed the EA from the first broker. This didn't make sense, so I stopped using my licensed version completely, and just use the II version. But, now, of course, I stopped using FapTurbo completely anyway. :|

Because we need to tweak the settings, maybe have to be done everyday !!! There were so much settings on the FapTurbo EA and we have to pay them extra to learn how to properly used these settings. That's is why I requested for refund on the 50th day.

I always wondered why my FapTurbo always crashes my live account but their live account seems to make a profit. Even when I tried using their recommended broker IAMFX :-?

Here is the link to FPA on FapTurbo Test 2. Test2 is manually tweaked by FapTurbo team and FPA monitor through investor account only. This prove that FapTurbo is not the ideal EA where we could set n forget.

 

 

 

This is what they (FPA) written on the test log:

 

03-19-2010This test of FAP Turbo v.50 is maintained by developers team. Test conducted with the recommended broker and optimized settings. Forex Peace Army monitors the account performance with investor access

 

Please see also our own Fap Turbo demo test with default settings. Before upgrade to v.50 our account was traded by the previous versions which simulate the experience of the long-term FAP Turbo user.

These are the same people who Kevin Long sold his "killer EA" with the purchase of Shockwave. So people bought the Shockwave through Kevin, then got linked to this site. After they get their money as an affiliate, they never answer your emails to get your bonus. So, the only recourse is to get refund, then buy thorough another affiliate you may like better than Kevin. X-(

This site is BS.

 

I bought through this site and get only links for VPS,free poor EAs and other crap.

 

They only want you to use their Hoplink to make money.

 

Stay away. Scam

Bully and Killer Bonuses

Yes. I am very unhappy with "Steve Hoftland". He made all these promises to send the "bully", and it never arrived. I wrote him several emails, since the beginning. Now, he has his money and will not respond. I received the same problem with the "Kevin Long" EA a few weeks ago. Now that he has his money he will not respond to any of the emails to receive his "Killer EA" with settings. X-(

I've bought the original version through bulletproofbully.com's link.

However, till now i haven't receive their bonuses like optimal setting etc.

Anyone having the same experience?

Other parts of the web site suggest a monthly fee for a live streaming data feed, even after you purchase the EA. It is a subscription, and the EA doesn't seem to work without it. :|

the guys said he uses fxmoneymap software.should i paid for the software and he said it need upgrade of about $199.can these be educated if bought.does the result show any inregularity

I notice that the educated version still requires the use of the dll file. I don't know if that might have an affect on the back testing.

i cant get that version to backtest.

This is the same version that was already supplied in this thread above, in message #8 by Fxknight.

http://[email protected]/file/AMg5Lepe/FishForexRobot_v1_47.html

I was using 1.47. The EA seemed to work OK, it's just that the market this past 2 weeks messed up the system with Zig-zag movements triggering several stop losses in a single day. My understanding was that the newer updates used the same system, but simply provided more options in terms of lot size etc., for people who want to customize the trades more. But, I didn't want more options, because I was concerned that I would probably just mess up the system. So, I was happy to just use the default settings in the old version, because it worked almost perfect. But, if you find that the newer versions actually have reduced the draw down then I would definitely give it a try again. 1.47 even took some more losses today. :-?

Sneed, what version are you speaking about? 1.47 or 1.51? The old has a few bugs but fixed on the 1.51. At least they say. The developer is Rita Lasker from Israel. They made also FX Informer96, signal provider, but nothing special.

Hermes

http://indo-investasi.com/showthread.php/8424-need-help-crack-this-ea

these are around somewhere on the forum if you want to do a search.

Yes, it did very well for me for a couple of months on my live account, then it lost all the the money it made in just 2 weeks. :((

Guys I test the old version on demo account for 3 months and still winning! It is good one but the latest version v1.15 I can get nowhere!

Hermes

It's been a few days and I have not gotten any trades yet. I set it up on 6 currency pairs, but I believe that it was only made for 4. The manual is not helpful about currency pairs, and seems to be incomplete. Has anyone else gotten any trades? I'm wondering if the spreads on FXCM might be too high. Also FXCM gives a lot of "old tick" error codes (maybe 100 per day).:-/

Yes for sure. no trade until now...

Yes. Most probably it is just a post office box. When making payments to IAMFX, you are really sending money to Morningview Group Inc. This is the parent company of GallantFX. I would not expect IAMFX to have their own servers, since the servers are probably located where GallantFx keeps their servers. If your friend wants to visit IAMFX, he would have better luck just visiting Morningview. Morningview is located at 1133 Broadway, Suite 706 New York, New York, 10010. We now live in a world of virtual reality. Virtual cities, games, gambling, and even brokers. As far as I am concerned IAMFX is just an "answering service" that happens to have access to your account using one of their laptops to access the main servers. This is the nature of "white label" brokers. They exist only on paper. They are not necessarily criminals, just over priced for what they provide, and poor execution of some trades. And you can probably do better by not going through a "third party" when accessing someone else's liquidity provider. ;))

Just an update yesterday I asked my friend to visit IAMFX office mentioned on website.

 

https://www.iamfx.com/contact.php

 

IamFX Inc.

 

280 Madison Avenue

Suite 912

New York, NY 10016

 

 

Surprise : There is not company by the name of IAMFX in that building .He visted them on Thursday @ 4:30pm. First the guard told clearly that there is no company by the name of IAMFX. So my friend opened his iphone showed the address printed on their website. Than guard allowed him to go upstairs and found room locked and that room mentioned NY time (I donot know what is this)

 

BEWARE

Yes. This was a free EA originally written by one of our members (Funyoo), but another person changed the name and sold it. So, there are a few versions out there. Basic, Gold, Paltinum (which I believe should have been listed as Plaltinum).8-)

Hello Guys,

Any one heard about magic machine, looks like an old product of last year but the reviews and comment on the net proved that It was a very good EA 90% modeling quality.

 

Here it is:

http://www.4shared.com/file/vGiZ2yUi/Magic_Machine_Paltinum.html

One of the points of his video is that there are no profitable EAs because when they are any good, the BIG banks would use them (or trade against them), then they (EAs) stop working (like FapTurbo). BUT, my question is, based on this logic, what would stop the "same banks" from using "his" EA, and thus make it worthless "also"??? If so many copies are being sold (more than he promised), won't this EA be worthless also, in a few weeks, if everyone (including the BIG banks) is using it? :-/

LoL, now important people are putting pressure on pip poacher to get REMOVED!

The Conspiracy has started.

 

just like so many previous 4x garbage bots

Thanks execution. This system DOES seem different than the "odds" system. I guess "pipeline" is a common term used in stock trading, commodities, etc. So, there are apparently several pipeline systems, depending on the author. But, it is nice to be able to compare both systems anyway. =D>

here you go njoi guys!!! this is the original system.....................

 

hxxp://www.m*axis*hare.ne*t/en/file/19089/secret-big.pdf.html
remove the *
mirrors:
hxxp://uplo*adr*obots.co*m/Ap5mxf
hxxp://www.sli*ngfi*le.co*m/file/Roh7sSHoyB

 

pm me if any probs ............

 

sorry forgot the pass : forexnow

Yes. I agree.

I was just trying to suggest that it may be difficult to crack if we remove the DLL as was done with other EA's such as Megadroid, etc. This EA seems more DLL dependent for updating trading strategy, than other EA's which operate just fine without the DLL file.

Actually, I am more concerned what my brokers will be able to learn about my account with MT5, than these people. Supposedly MT5 will allow brokers to read your EA code, even with custom EA's. :-? Although, maybe a trade copier can be used to block MT5 spyware in the same way....

Hi Sneed,

 

I don't know if this EA is good or not, time will tell.

 

But regarding your concerns that their program connects to their server, you can place this EA on a demo account and use a trade copier to your real account, that way, there is no risk they could see something about your real personal data. ;)

(and this holds true for any other program that connect through DLL to server's owner)

I see no difference between the EA's based on your link. Since the person marketing Poacher has been using the EA for several months, maybe it was called Robovore when he first purchased it. I would be curious if both EA's cost the same also, with all the upsells. Now we just need to figure out if it is a stolen EA, or if the Rovobore people are behind both products. It is really difficult to argue with the information you provided in your link. :-/

I am hearing that this Ea may be a copy of Robovore, Has anyone read this?

 

hxxp://www.driven2success.com/forum/

A lot of people had problems with installation. They decided to change people's receipt codes a few hours ago. You need to try the new receipt code and see if that works. They should have emailed you approximately 1:00 pm EST, with your new code to use.

But, I am also bothered by all the "upsells" they offer, making the EA seem like junk unless you buy all the upgrades which are 3x the cost of the original EA, with monthly fees, etc. etc. :-O Also, it definitely connects with their server all the time getting feedback. They know more about your trading account than you do with that DLL spy file. ;))

I bought it to try...the moment I drag the EA onto the chart, MT4 crashes.

 

I am using the latest MT4 2.26. I have tried both IBFX and alpari UK. Both crashes.

In addition to the trade losses, as you stay with them, you learn that their "FREE" VPS is not free. As mentioned you need to trade 5 contracts a month, or 500 trades if you trade .01 contracts. If you trade only 499 micro contracts that month, you still pay the FULL $35! You get no credit for all the commissions they made from the 499 trades, as an example. Also, if your account falls below $400, you will also be charged the $35 VPS fee. They GET you either way.:berbusa:

When you trade directly with GallantFX, (their technology provider) there are no such nonsense VPS fees. Free VPS with GallantFX is really free. (However, I do not necessarily recommend GallantFX for scalping, because their spreads can be a little high).

Though we are making a little profit with AiCashRobot with them, we are planning to close the account with them. Since I've managed to download the AICashRobot EAs from their VPS....heeee.

 

The main reason we decided to close is because they are unregulated and the slippage was high. We have the same trade on FXCM and IamFX, FXCM closed our trade exactly at our Target Profit. IamFX have the Target Profit triggered but closed our order at 10pips lower! Talked to online chat and they requested us to submit a support ticket. We submitted a support ticket and also email them about a week ago, till now still have not get any response!

 

We were not able to run back test through their platform, error encountered was Test Generator Error: No tick generated. After submitted the support ticket about two weeks ago with the specific details, they replied last week with a question "VPS or MT4 itself?". We have specifically stated in the support ticket that we tried on both, VPS and MT4 on our computer. Guess we will have to wait for another 2 weeks. Online chat also requested us to submit a support ticket.

 

Commission is high, 0.01%, that's about USD 10 per standard lot. For EURUSD, or any xxxUSD pair, it's equivalent to 1 pip. Adding the commission to the spread, say for EURUSD which varies between 0.6 to 1.3, will be 1.6 to 2.3! Rather go with other STP brokers like GoMarkets, or FXCM, or Alpari Classic account. (Alpari Micro account is trading through their Dealing Desks, Be Careful!)

I also found it interesting that when they give their EA a "new" name, it is usually a name of another EA that came on the market only a few weeks earlier. For example, when they changed the name from FTS to "Samurai", another EA with the same name (Samurai) came out a few weeks earlier. Then when they changed the name from Samurai to "Revolution", another company launched their own EA called "Revolution" several weeks earlier also. Is this all just coincidence, or are these people trying to be "funny"? :-O

This series of EAs, I look like a simple scam, these people are marketing the same EA with different names

just curious as to optimize and assure them that if you optimize the "MACD SAMPLE" that comes installed by default on all platforms Meta, better results are obtained,

 

therefore, and from my point of view, I consider a waste of time.

 

 

Confirmed, I just look at the code ForexFTS, and is absolutely the same.

Yes, what I meant is NFA. I remember that JadeFX had mentioned that an annual membership fee with NFA is approximately $50K. This cost would be in addition to required funds needed to meet eligibility requirements, such as reserve capital to cover liquidity, etc. So, that was just one of the reasons they avoided membership, in addition to not wanting to deny hedging to its customers.

I believe that you will have no problem getting customers from this Forum when it is ready. I know that JadeFx instantly got many customers from this Forum "before" they were even ready to launch.

Many people are not happy with their current brokers. And even people who "are" happy with their current brokers, sometimes would like to add another broker anyway.

 

I am not sure what you mean by regulated in the US, if you mean to get my self registered with the NFA, then 50K is diffenately not enough.

 

I would like to be kept updated on this project if the thread is moved. I also tried JadeFx and the "Collective", and things just didn't work out. So, I am always looking for ways to get an EA to work better. :-bd

Ultimately, there is always overhead costs to consider, and if we want reliable customer service, the staff needs to be reasonably paid. But, the monthly fees required by the "Collective" just didn't work out too well, because you have to pay "a monthly fee" whether you trade or not.

I know that IamFx, basically was created over night by getting a franchise (white wrapper) brokerage IB (introducing broker) "arrangement" where you basically get Gallant FX with higher spreads (and commissions). So, the customer service is not so great, their "free VPS" isn't really free ($35 per month deducted from your trading account). For such a high cost, the VPS is junk, since it only links you with "their" brokerage. While a regular (less expensive) VPS allows you to install "multiple" brokerages of your own choice. Why pay $35 per month for a VPS that you have no "true" access to. You don't even get a "trader's desktop" which allows you store other applications on it (which other, lower cost VPS providers DO include with their basic service).

So, depending on how much money is available for your project, a "white wrapper" is probably the cheapest way to go, but you don't necessarily have to be as "money hungry" as IamFx. The problem with "white wrapper" is that you would have to find a better brokerage than "Gallant" to clone. Maybe a brokerage like Dukascopy. But, I don't think that Dukascopy actually offers "white wrapper" franchises.

But, to create a brokerage from scratch is close to impossible without a lot of money and attorneys. That is why I believe that both JadeFx and the Collective, had some relationship with "Boston Technologies" when they first launched their brokerages, rather than "reinvent the wheel" by forming a brokerage from scratch. Just my personal opinion and experience, but, as technology continues, opening your own brokerage gets easier every day, as long as you don't try to be regulated in US, where there is an additional $50K fee, per year, which basically gives you nothing, and restricts your customers from "hedging". ;))

Salam Abdul,

 

As you know, i was very much part of the beginning of the jadefx project. I will enter this discussion too, not for the vip purpose, but, for learning and bringing my experience.

 

But i think this thread ought to be moved from here. I maight also invite other poeple to this thread if

the discussion is consistent.

 

regards,

 

Jackdan

I regularly reboot my VPS once a week just to make more memory available. I notice that sometimes the MT4 platform will accumulate some large log files which eat up memory. After I reboot, the memory is more available.

As for myself, this FTS EA completed its first trade, but, for a scalper, I thought it should trade more often than just once every few days. I am still getting invitations for the optimized version that I mentioned above, but it requires purchasing the older version, :(( which we already have, then the optimized version is sent for free.

It may have been a local problem (don't know 4 sure yet) as I had major dramas later that day. I am subscribed to Rocketman on Rentasignal, & I realised later that trades that Rocketman had placed stopped being managed by the copier EA. I had Rentasignal try & diagnose the problem as well my VPS provider - hours upon hours of f#@$%ng around later, the conclusion was made that the only solution is to wipe my VPS and start again. I haven't got around to setting it back up yet.