Timingsolution & Nifity page

[toandtd]

https://mega.nz/file/mRoygRDb#jPn_QdBanxRiT3oxzgbAGr-K9m23byM5P_8mL0mh4yc - 9 Feb 21 Version of Terra.

Experimental QSpectrum V2 is included in this version which is supposed to be very fast and more accurate. This is an work in progress and hence dont put too much reliance on the results.

Thank so much, can you give me new crack for this version?

[kesk]

https://mega.nz/file/zE5UTJ5Q#-Sp3R05FORtw8LkX2Rq1OtAPA9M8rZndjEI6rMwORJM - 20 Feb 2021 Ver.

QSpectrum 2 module has an Optimization function on the SM and Overtones and an option to select the optimization on single selected period or all the periods. This is an work in progress so dont bet money on this.

[kesk]

Better not download the 20 Feb version, there is another release on 21 Feb. Looks like some bug and improvement going on daily. Lets wait for a stable release.

[kesk]

https://mega.nz/file/jdoDzIAR#WS3xdpv8joaFKmgxgaIo7oLmjZb45wuOUZmxbrEsz w0 - Feb 25 Version.

Update on Annual Cycle was done. Basically a redesign of the natural cycles.

[kesk]

is this program really useful to anybody? Looks like no one posts their view. I am curious.

[quietgeorge1]

Kesk,
I think it's the best program out there,and appreciate the updates and sharing.
Still learning how to use it fully.

[laser1000it]

is this program really useful to anybody? Looks like no one posts their view. I am curious.

The one way to answer at your issue is that this program is as reliable as a flip of a coin, anyone who claims otherwise can always prove it of course I thank you for your free contribution and effort............... while others member are just here to sell

[laser1000it]

The one way to answer at your issue is that this program is as reliable as a flip of a coin, anyone who claims otherwise can always prove it of course I thank you for your free contribution and effort............... while others member are just here to sell

@at now short Bund Eurex 3/21 @173,28

[iatin]

is this program really useful to anybody? Looks like no one posts their view. I am curious.

of course it's useful

[Shenong]

As i have suggested / informed in a previous post, this software is requesting, ideally, to get some serious knowledge in astrology, because it uses lots of astro factors in its complex algorythms, and if you don't know anything in astro, you may easily spend months or years trying to choose some efficient params...

Even the DEV Sergei TARASOV is adding useless astro factors, because he is more on the tech-math side of astrology than on the WORKING Symbols ( which require dozen years of practice to be used efficiently )...

FACT is Sergei is an excellent DEV, but lacks almost totally the ASTROLOGER side.

He has never been an ASTROLOGER-CONSULTANT...

EXAMPLE : adding hundreds oe thousands of asteroids won't help nobody to compute better neural networks.....

Very very FEW Experienced astrologers use asteroids, because there are around 400 000 of 'em, so, in fact, they mean NOTHING ( Thousands are small sized 1.5 / 5 meters Rocks ) . Put 10000 of 'em on an astro chart, and you can let your imagination invent explain anything, based on the names of the asteroids...

The most "famous" asteroidian astrologer is named Mark Pottenger and he had computed around 150 000 orbital equations, always adding "NEW rocks to his collection, in the goal to prove more and more his Asteroidian Theories...

He had worked with his mother ( Deceased now ) Zipporah Pottenger Dobyns during years.....I have MET personally both of them in a PARIS Congress in 1990, and they were "FULLY" inhabited by Asteroids....Nothing else.