Forex Crescendo - EA on page 1

[pro]

Its a clear scam

 

The author did not respond when I aksed to show more backtest for this

 

The EA is heavily curve fitted and those crooks are still selling it eventhough they know that it is a losing EA

that will wipe out people's accounts

 

they make me puke

 

probably it is... he didn't publish my sceptical comment...only a** kissers are welcome there

[iqofgenius]

He says it averages .56% per day which on a $10000 account trading one full lot is only $56. Then you look at the trade sheets and you see gains and losses in excess of 40 pips trading minis. What gives?

[fxshare]

Andrea

Could you please stop the bullshit already and show us the backtest for years before 2009?

 

Lets see if he will do that :)

 

Some analysis below.. (for newbies who are planning to go live seeing the excellent past trade records, that too in a live account) . From 11th aug the EA was accumulating GBPUSD long positions . total of five 5 buys till 24th aug. and then EA was just "waiting" for the pair to move up inorder to close them all in +40 pips profit (they had to wait over a month and finally got the opportunity only on 15th Sept !) .Am sure they must have been waiting for these positions to get closed before relasing the EA :D

 

2010.08.11 00:00 buy 0.10 gbpusd 1.58533 0.00000 0.00000 2010.09.15 16:32 1.56128 0.00 0.00 -2.19 -241 -240.50

2010.08.11 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpusd 1.56772 0.00000 0.00000 2010.09.15 16:32 1.56139 0.00 0.00 -2.19 -63 -63.30

2010.08.12 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpusd 1.55927 0.00000 0.00000 2010.09.15 16:32 1.56203 0.00 0.00 -2.01 28 27.60

2010.08.20 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpusd 1.55241 0.00000 0.00000 2010.09.15 16:32 1.56203 0.00 0.00 -1.53 96 96.20

2010.08.24 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpusd 1.53892 0.00000 0.00000 2010.09.15 16:32 1.56158 0.00 0.00 -1.41 227 226.60

 

On 7th sept (GBPUSD low 1.5295) holding positions' combined drawdown would have been around -553 + -377 + -292 + -224 + -89 = -1535 pips

[fxshare]

Same case with GY . Only buys from 10th aug to 30th aug. All positions were closed on 30th .

 

2010.08.10 00:00 buy 0.10 gbpjpy 136.678 0.000 0.000 2010.08.30 03:40 133.419 0.00 0.00 0.51 -326 -379.86

2010.08.10 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpjpy 135.451 0.000 0.000 2010.08.30 03:40 133.417 0.00 0.00 0.51 -203 -237.10

2010.08.11 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpjpy 133.458 0.000 0.000 2010.08.30 03:40 133.415 0.00 0.00 0.51 -4 -5.01

2010.08.24 00:00 buy 0.10 gbpjpy 131.979 0.000 0.000 2010.08.30 03:40 133.415 0.00 0.00 0.21 144 167.39

2010.08.20 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpjpy 132.651 0.000 0.000 2010.08.30 03:40 133.419 0.00 0.00 0.25 77 89.52

2010.08.24 12:00 buy 0.10 gbpjpy 129.801 0.000 0.000 2010.08.30 03:40 133.399 0.00 0.00 0.21 360 419.43

 

Just think if you'd gone live with this EA on aug 1st week .. Combined DD on 24th aug (when it touched 128.77) would have been approx -790 + -668 + -481 + -320 + -388 + -103 = -2750 pips :-O

 

The EA will work perfectly fine until you get into a daily trend like this (Aug 2008).

http://i53.tinypic.com/20fp8rd.jpg

 

Imagine you were accumulating Longs starting aug 1st @-)

[Abdulisback]

Thanks FXshare

 

so it's a hold and hope system, that explains why thye don't want to show a 10 years backtest

 

I 100% sure that this does blow up an account if backtest before 2009... ALL "hold and hope" systems end up blowing up the account

[robotfx2]

i would like to try this....anyone share please

[freddy]

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/4864/chivapiano.gif

[noone]

We appreciate if andreas can share this. :D

[Abdulisback]

We appreciate if andreas can share this. :D

 

hahahahahaha

[ghost127]

This is similar with cable run. GBPUSD and GBPJPY are good for trade.

There is some difficulty in trading, for example 07232010th

He needs to be a lot of margin

 

http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/8342/cablerun.jpg

 

http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/1343/crescendotrading.png

[FrankM]

Here's the file guys, ...

 

h**p://***.4*hared.com/file/nuOFlMaD/Crescendo_v1.html

[ghost127]

1 month trade with cable 10000 dollars with 0.1 to 13456 Only GBPUSD H1

 

http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/5904/1monthcable.jpg

[dave123]

Is the above for cable run or crescendo? I have cable run working but all it has done is place two orders a buy and a sell) two days ago which have not yet been triggered.

[ggrays1999]

Any idea of username and password? I tried also to decompile the file to educate, but decompiler won't crack this one open......

[dave123]

Think we are missing the user name and password in order to make it work. I will not authenticate it.

[robotfx2]

Here's the file guys, ...

 

h**p://***.4*hared.com/file/nuOFlMaD/Crescendo_v1.html

 

any chance sharing the username and clickbank receipt code

or any coder here please decompile and educate this

 

Thanks

[richdad711]

I wonder why the developer named all the FUNCTIONS as pure binary number (ie 1 and 0). anybody can tell?

 

#property copyright "Copyright © 2010, Andrea Salvatore"

#property link "http://www.forexcrescendo.com"

 

#import "Crescendo.dll"

double l1101111100110001(int a0, bool a1, int a2, double a3, double a4);

double l0100100111110100(int a0, bool a1, int a2, double a3, double a4);

double l1010101110110011(int a0, double a1, double a2, double a3);

int l0011111110111100(int a0, int a1, int a2);

int l1010100101110100(double a0, double a1, bool a2, int a3);

int l1000000110011010(int a0);

int l0011001010000111(double a0);

string l0110010111101110(string a0);

string l0111110110000011(string a0);

string l1000011101110010(string a0);

string l1001110101110000(string a0);

string l1100011011100111(string a0);

#import

[⭐ musketeer]

I wonder why the developer named all the FUNCTIONS as pure binary number (ie 1 and 0). anybody can tell?

 

#property copyright "Copyright © 2010, Andrea Salvatore"

#property link "http://www.forexcrescendo.com"

 

#import "Crescendo.dll"

double l1101111100110001(int a0, bool a1, int a2, double a3, double a4);

double l0100100111110100(int a0, bool a1, int a2, double a3, double a4);

double l1010101110110011(int a0, double a1, double a2, double a3);

int l0011111110111100(int a0, int a1, int a2);

int l1010100101110100(double a0, double a1, bool a2, int a3);

int l1000000110011010(int a0);

int l0011001010000111(double a0);

string l0110010111101110(string a0);

string l0111110110000011(string a0);

string l1000011101110010(string a0);

string l1001110101110000(string a0);

string l1100011011100111(string a0);

#import

 

have you been decompile it?

[FrankM]

Guys... I don't have a clickbank number for it.. I got it from another source but wanted to share the files with you in the hope of some of our great programmers might be able to check it out.

 

Frank

[domonkos]

Hi,

 

Please educate!

 

Thank you!!!

Kudo!!!

[junglist00]

I wonder why the developer named all the FUNCTIONS as pure binary number (ie 1 and 0). anybody can tell?

 

.................

string l1000011101110010(string a0);

string l1001110101110000(string a0);

string l1100011011100111(string a0);

#import

 

I think it makes it a little harder to understand logic, i guess you can go thru each and replace all with name that is easier to understand .

[SHARKspear]

I guess Andrea had another version. He just used the Find & Replace to change the names before he release it to discourage cracking / educating - LOL.

 

Remember he is a very clever programmer, not an unskilled scammer who steal from free EA, repackage and sell.

Edited September 29, 2010 by SHARKspear

[richdad711]

I guess Andrea had another version. He just used the Find & Replace to change the names before he release it to discourage cracking / educating - LOL.

 

Remember he is a very clever programmer, not an unskilled scammer who steal from free EA, repackage and sell.

]

 

that's what i thought as well but who knows, he might have done it to hide the original name of functions that came from other commercial or free EAs...

[Stormin_Norman]

I guess Andrea had another version. He just used the Find & Replace to change the names before he release it to discourage cracking / educating - LOL.

 

Remember he is a very clever programmer, not an unskilled scammer who steal from free EA, repackage and sell.

 

]

 

that's what i thought as well but who knows, he might have done it to hide the original name of functions that came from other commercial or free EAs...

 

Both as likely as the other.

[MetaCrazy]

in a DLL you can change the name of the DLL but you cannot change the name of the functions of an uncracked DLL. and still have it work.