Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.automatedpips.com/blog.html

 

They show an 8-month and a five-year forward test that started in 2006 with MB trading. Did MB even have an MT4 out in 2006? With a little research i found that these are the same people behind ForexSTF.

 

here is the affiliate page

 

http://www.automatedpips.com/jv.html

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
There are not forward tests, but demo

http://www.automatedpips.com/statement1k2010.htm

http://www.automatedpips.com/statement06now.htm

 

There are missing data from 05.07.2010 to 07.07.2010

This is a bug of Mql4 data tester

 

I checked some of the data, they are good

 

trust me. they are fake accounts, created from backtest results to be made to look like forward tests.

"It is inconceivable that anyone will divulge a truly effective get-rich scheme for the price of a book."

Victor Niederhoffer (1943–), US hedge fund manager and statistician

Posted
But then it looks good.

 

can anyone please share and let us test?

 

It is not released yet.

 

As both Stormin_Norman and ghost127 have mentioned the "live" results are a lie. It is more of the same garbage with a different sales pitch

Posted
http://www.automatedpips.com/blog.html

 

They show an 8-month and a five-year forward test that started in 2006 with MB trading. Did MB even have an MT4 out in 2006? With a little research i found that these are the same people behind ForexSTF.

 

here is the affiliate page

 

http://www.automatedpips.com/jv.html

 

It looks like this scumbag has corrected it and now it does not show "MB broker" any more!

Posted

Mark Fric, the 'morning trade' pusher sent me this email:

 

"Unfortunately, just recently I learned an interesting thing about them. Their statements are from MB Trading broker, but after a research we'll find out that MB Trading did not actually have MetaTrader platform back in 2006, so the statements on the website are indeed FAKE. They are not live account statements. For this reason I DON'T RECOMMEND this EA. Also, I'd like to apologize for wasting your time with a product I didn't know first hand."

 

Looks like he reads II too

Posted
I as well as others made several posts on the blog questioning things and still so many people were praising this Jeff character. However, I will admit to being curious what strategy the EA uses.
Posted
'upselling' is the new scam. u pay 97, then the fuckers want to sell us something else for another 97. then optimisation for another 97.

"It is inconceivable that anyone will divulge a truly effective get-rich scheme for the price of a book."

Victor Niederhoffer (1943–), US hedge fund manager and statistician

Posted (edited)
is it educated? or does it need to be?

 

No, I don't think so, it just seems to work.

I think the optimization business is a scam.

 

This will do well for awhile and eventually blow up due to no stoploss.

 

However, it may still have potential.. if you equalize the TP and SL to 50-100 pips you could apply a D'Alembert progression to it manually and do pretty well.

Profit factor on backtesting M1 on several pairs is around .95, that's good enough for a conservative progression.

Edited by conglo

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...