fughe

Has any used this, of at the very least ran some tick tests on it? Would be awesome if someone could post a myfxbook link if you find one.

Get an account with IBFX. They have a lot of extra scripts and software added to their mt4 platforms that do this kind of stuff.

This bot cannot be educated. all the logic is in the DLL.

This is another link to that damn website that doesn't make any sense. Everyone be VERY careful having anything to do with this. They claim to pay out huge amounts of money to the people running system, but there is no source of income anywhere. It screams SCAM. You have been warned.

Wow.....Nobody is up for it. Well, that is okay. I have figured it out finally. Portable code is great.

Eh, whatever. This is all part of the plan to make this a slave world. What I find hard to believe is that people in the US don't see that the last several Presidents have had this same agenda. The only difference is, nowdays they are so close to having total power that they are starting to not care if the public sees what they are doing.

If someone happens to have a decompiled version of FFMv2.5, it would be cool if you posted it. Doesn't need to be educated. I paid for a license to it. I just want to see what changes they made in the code.

Nope, it didn't really help any at all. I already use trailing EAs to add functions. You can't put the system to the test without setting up a demo account and spending months or years waiting for the data. So therefore, the trailing EAs are worthless to test new concepts.

 

My point is, it would be useful to know how to add an extra function that was entirely independent form the original EA to test different concepts. It would seem to be incredibly useful to have a piece of code that you liked for setting a BE (as an example), that you could paste it into the EA and add the necessary call in somewhere to initialize it without having to sort through hundreds of lines of code to integrate it. Or even set it up as a script and put in an external call to execute it from the EA.

 

It seems to me that this should be possible, but I don't know enough about mq4 to know what is possible and what isn't yet. That is why i posted the question. Seems like this would be something fairly simple for a good coder to demonstrate with a real life example. For all that it matters, someone could even use the mt4 MACD EA as their base for the example, since everyone has access to that code.

 

I am just trying to get this programming thread going with some programming schooling. Nobody has offered up any useful information about coding yet. I have given an example of a concept that i would like to understand. So, if nobody wants to tackle this concept, then please, at least start somewhere.

Well, since this a a coding/programming subforum intended to teach programming skills..... and since it seems every post in recent history is missing the point.....let me bring the focus back to the original topic with a very useable question.

 

Let's say you have purchased an EA that gives great signals, but often allows the market to fall back to a loss. it already has a built-in trailing logic that works great over the long term, but you want to try and kill some of the losses by adding a breakeven setting to it. How would a person go about adding a simple breakeven function to this commercial EA, that would allow them to set when the BE triggers and how far it will move the BE into profit?

 

Someone can easily select a random decompiled EA from the forum and display the EA before and after the code has been added. i believe at least a few new coders (me included) would find information like this to be useful as it would demonstrate how to incorporate entirely new functions into an EA without having to code the EA from the ground up with the function planned from the beginning.

Oh yeah....I also recommend editing the money management and changing the risk percentage from 1% to 0.1%. Anything more is just asking to blow your account.

From my understanding of it.....

 

You need an absolute minimum of $1000 for a single pair using 400:1 leverage 0.01 lot available size on initial opening order WITH hedging activated. If you have less leverage, you need more cash. if you don't use hedging, you need more cash. If you don't have micros available for initial opening positions then you need a LOT more money (add an extra $99,000). We are ONLY dealing with what is necessary for a SINGLE currency pair.

 

Use those numbers to calculate what your minimum account equity needs to be.

 

Additional notes on hedging.... The way this EA works, it is highly recommended to use hedging. It is assumed that this EA will go into huge DD. If you activate hedging, it will continue to make money as teh DD increases due to the continued opening of positions in the direction of the trend. This also gives a near 100% guarantee that you will always have a big DD.

 

If you are brave enough to run this EA, make sure you have plenty of capital and a back up incase you need to dump extra money into the account to avoid a margin call. Martingales are terrible for doing that. Also be aware that using another EA in the account will use extra equity. If you use another EA in an account with TEA, you WILL need to monitor the account regularly to ensure the equity level maintains a high availablity to TEA. it is recommended to give TEA an account of it's own.

Thor cannot be educated. Almost all of the actual calcs are done inside the dll.

Would like to take a look at the code in this EA if someone doesn't mind decomping....

 

hxxp://xxx.multiupl0ad.c0m/6JBXUKB4TR

I normally do not like using educated EAs, but i paid for this damn thing and can't effin' get it to authorize. I would greatly appreciate it if someone would educate this just so i can use what i paid for to at the very least run some damn BTs on the f##king thing.

From my experience, a simple manual system is fairly easy to program into an EA. A really good comprehensive manual system, that seems straight forward to a human trader, is wickedly complex to put into a hard-coded set of rules. Add to that the fact that the logic must continually be "updated" to adapt to current market conditions.

Learn to trade manually and trade real forex. Binary options are not as profitable. The companies that are doing the binary options are considered gambling operations for a reason. The systems are arranged so that you will lose. If you want to gamble, then go for it. If you want to make money, trade forex.

Yeah, this is not an autotrading EA. It is a tool to be used in conjunction with your manual trading. It is capable of showing you upcoming news events, etc. You still must have a profitable manual system that you can use it with.

The last time I traded futures, my broker screwed me over worse than I have ever been screwed over in forex. Just sayin....

has anyone ever figured out where the money is coming from to pay the developers?

I would really like to see the results of someone using an arb system with mt4. Not on my accounts, but on theirs. :)

The thought has crossed my mind as to where he is just a hired marketer for that group. He is definitely skirting the issue of posting a live account. If I cared enough, I might actually waste some time to crack the dll....but i don't. :D

Oh yeah, and slippage will murder your profit....any slippage.....at all.

Wow....the further this gets into the test, the more I find it hard to believe it could ever be profitable on a live account. It is opening orders, making multiple modifications, and closing out in under a second. The equity curve is insanely good, but it will be a miracle if it works on a live a account.

Well, I just started a dukas data test on it. had to find out what was going on. I can verify that it is a hardcore scalper. To make this work on a live account, you will need a wickedly fast broker. You think MDP is a hardcore scalper.....Hahahahahahahaha! MDP doesn't have anything on this.

So, I guess I will open a penny account and put $100 in it, Set it to trade a single nano lot for the duration of my 90 day gaurantee. then if it doesn't trade profitably, I will pop over to plimus and get my 100% guarantee, plus the extra $100 if it doesn't trade profitably. On a $100 acc, even if it does blow the account, I will still end up with a profit! So I win either way! :)

That is what it seems. MDP has been profitable for me, so it may turn out to be a good thing.....until it becomes popular. :D