birt

Re: astrotrader price & time wheel

I'll be blunt. I don't trade forex for a living. All my income is coming from "real" work. So, when I have to choose between spending several hours on some software that someone thinks might be useful, I naturally prefer to spend that time working on a contract-based project. The time I would spend "educating" this particular software would most likely be worth more than a copy of the software. Moreover, I never even said I would do it. Would you have been happier if I didn't post at all? It sure sounds like you won me in a poker game and my performance isn't in line with the specifications from the attached documentation...

Bottom line, don't expect me to work on everything that gets posted. I don't use any of the software I educate so I have nothing to gain from doing it.

Re: Forex Harvester

In the tester, all the time wrote

Forex Harvester V17 EURJPY, H4: ArrayCopyRates function internal error

Download the history for that pair.

Re: astrotrader price & time wheel

Thanks Harvey Norman ;) :D and Pathfinder for bringing up this issue, need maybe Birt to reverse it! Thanks

It's using ExeCryptor and while unpacking it wasn't particularly hard, the protection is done pretty thoroughly. This means that I would need quite a lot of time to do it, which I don't have so I'm passing on it.

Re: Quantumrobot

Was it educated ?

Yes, although I haven't tested them because I lack the time.

I can see ' Licensed Till : 2010. 03.31 ' on the chart.

That is just a text message that the EA displays, unrelated to the "protection". It will not actually expire. If you want it gone, decompile it and remove the message.

The Quantum robots (all 5) are available free from the Quantum robot website: http://www.quantumrobot.com. They make their money by referring you to trade with one of several brokerage houses. :)

They might be free, but they're designed to run exclusively on a few brokerages.

Anybody willing to share all or 1 of the EAs Quantum Plus, Quantum Pips, Quantum Mac, Quantum Leap, Quantum News

Congratulations for not reading the first post.

can anyone remove the limitation!!?

If you're referring to the limitation discussed above (the "licensed until" comment on the chart), there's no need to remove it.

Re: Forex Harvester

birt please help ^:)^

I'm pretty busy for a while, don't think I'll have the time to get to it until something like mid-march. Hopefully someone else will take care of it by then.

Re: Quantumrobot

Hi,

The .zip file has not nothing :(

I decompress de .zip, write de key but I can not get the contain.

 

Is it happening to anybody else?

It's not a zip, it's a rar. Use winrar and it'll work.

Re: Fusion v1.1a

How do you explain that your educated version 1.1 doesn't works on Live account and only on Demo ?

Easy, as fx4a said, you're doing something wrong.

Re: FX DealButler

The software is made in such a way that it will expire on the 3rd of each month, requiring you to get a new key. While it would be possible to remove its expiration, it has a lot of files and it would just be a waste of my time. All you have to do if you get an "expired" message is running the keygen again. This has been repeatedly explained in this thread.

Re: Fusion v1.1a

Hi,

 

the version 1.1 of Birt doesn't works on Live Account :(

Uhm, yes, it does. If you read the thread you will notice multiple people ran it live. Also, while reading it, you'll find 1.2 posted as well.

Re: MT4 To Currenex API Bridge [REQ]

What you probably want is a MT4 client to currenex trade copier, such as the one described at

http://www.goforex.net/forex-software.htm

Like the bridges available at the other two URLs, the Boston Tech bridge is only usable with a MT4 server/data center setup so it's probably useless to you. It's not a very good bridge anyway, despite its rather nice features.

If you really ever have to trade those amounts with an automated software, it's safer to hire a programmer to rewrite the code using the Currenex FIX interface.

In a different thread you mentioned that you are rather new to trading and that you were having your finals so I imagine you're a student. Curiosity strikes me - care to enlighten us how does a student with close to no experience in the forex market get to trade such amounts? I'm inclined to think that investors wouldn't find you a very appealing fund manager and if you're trading family money, it might be better to trade smaller lot sizes until you have at least a few years of experience.

Last, but not least, when trading such amounts, it's a very bad idea to do it with forum-found software. Keep in mind that you have no tech support if you don't buy it and if your bridge (or whatever other software) suddenly stops working when a 50+ lot trade goes south, it might end up costing you hundreds of times the price of the software.

Re: Forex UltraBot

There's an educated v2 of this at http://indo-investasi.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=8123. I couldn't help noticing that it no longer downloads the curve fit settings from the server so perhaps it's worth a try now.

Re: [REQ] forexultrabot DOT com

Found from another place. Working. Without DLL

 

http://[email protected]/file/229701808/88df446f/Forex_Ultrabot_2.html

The version I had was 1.2. It appears version 2 isn't curvefitted in the same manner as the version I had.

Re: [REQ] forexultrabot DOT com

In a backtest, it's getting historic optimized settings, which is clearly a case of curvefitting. It might be getting updated current settings as well but I strongly doubt a forward test of it will turn out as profitable as the backtest. You can disable using the optimized settings in backtest by adding

gi_332 = TRUE;

in the init function.

By historic optimized settings I mean an array of values that says something like this "after 20.12.2005, only trade long; after 22.12.2005, only trade short; after 25.12.2005...".

Re: Forex UltraBot

Like I said in the other thread, this is a scam. It connects to the developer's website and downloads a ton of optimized settings for different backtest periods, resulting in a really good looking backtest. Can't get more curvefit than this. If you disable the login completely, the settings will still be downloaded. If you'd like that, you can log the backtest settings for each pair to a CSV file then hardcode them in the EA or have them loaded from the CSV to disable server access completely. It's a rather shitty EA when it's not using the curve-fit settings, which can also be rather easily disabled.

Re: ECN stuff EA's only

scarface, see what I mean? ;))

dinj:

Add this somewhere at the beginning of your EA:

#include <LibOrderReliable.mqh>

Download LibOrderReliable.mqh and LibOrderReliable.mq4. Google them, they should be in a pack. Put the mqh file in includes, the mq4 file in libraries.

In your EA, replace all instances of "OrderSend" with "OrderSendReliable2Step".

That's it.

Re: (ASK) close all on candle color change

how would i write this simple code?

 

 

close all orders on candle color change

 

if((redcandle))closebuy();

if((greencandle))closesell();

 

much thanks

if (Close[1] < Open[1]) CloseBuy(); // previous bar closed below its open
if (Close[1] > Open[1]) CloseSell(); // previous bar closed above its open

If you need to write closebuy() and closesell() yourself, just loop through the orders from OrdersTotal()-1 to 0, selectively closing OP_SELL and OP_BUY. There's a lot of examples, you can find them in pretty much any EA.

It's a good idea to only run that code on a new bar to prevent closing any newly open orders that go "against" the previous bar.

Re: Developing S/R Expert : Highly Profitable : 99 % Accuracy

Sure, I would like to see more details, I'm particularly curious to see a real account statement that turned $600 into $800k in 3 months with 4% drawdown, seeing that's quite a feat to accomplish.

The whole discussion was sliding towards "if you don't post proof the thread isn't valid", which I never implied, is quite far from the actual situation and constitutes the reason I specified that I do not require any such proof myself. I was merely saying that soundfx posted some valid concerns, I never said I needed anything. I don't know where exactly did you get that idea. Moreover, in the same post that you quoted, I mentioned that an account statement would go a great length to validating the profitability of the strategy, thus perhaps convincing any available potential programmers to start working on an implementation. It seems to me that, just as you said, you simply failed to understand my post.

Re: ECN stuff EA's only

To put it simply, what he is saying is that once you included the LibOrderReliable MQH as he said, you can simply replace all "OrderSend" with "OrderSendReliable2Step" and it will start working on STP/ECN brokers without changing any of the parameters passed to the function. In addition to this, you gain some more added benefits such as automatic retrying, detailed logging etc. provided by that library.

Re: FX DealButler

Hello birt my platform is working now is good can any member post the butler video here thats the instruction for the basic and advance breakout system

Glad to hear you solved your problem, but sorry, I don't have those. I wrote that keygen on Cyrillic's request and simply didn't look into the package any further.

Re: [REQ] forexultrabot DOT com

There are probably quite a few that are profitable. However, I'm not in a position to recommend any. It's up to everyone's trading style - for instance, some may like martingale, some may not, some may like Asian scalpers, some may not. I suggest checking out one of the threads about EAs that are making money live.

As for that firepips signal, an EA is mentioned there sporadically as a "work in progress", but from what I gather it's usable.

Re: Fusion V 1.2 Nedd Educated

Ok I've already download the link to setup package.. but I think is not the original...

What exactly is it about that setup package that makes you think it's not the original?

To me, the setup kit looks pretty much the same as the original does, so I'm assuming it's produced by the same script, thus by the same author.

Re: Developing S/R Expert : Highly Profitable : 99 % Accuracy

Don't misunderstand me - I'm not requiring you to post any proof. Even if you did post some statements and it was looking good, my schedule is way too full at the moment to accommodate a new project. All I'm saying is that soundfx did express some valid concerns and that it would most likely draw a lot more attention if you had some demo statements - if everything goes as you said in the first post regarding the 99% win rate and the amount of pips that come with each trade, such proof would speak a great many words in favor of the strategy.

By the way, is anyone trading this manually? Harry007 perhaps? Do keep everyone updated on your progress, thanks in advance :)

Re: Fusion V 1.2 Nedd Educated

How do you explain that with the original fusion v1.1 my antivirus said not was a trojan and with the new v1.2, the antivirus said was a trojan ??

The DLL from v1.2 is slightly different from the one that came with v1.1, however the offsets still match. If I'm not mistaken, the first post includes a link to the setup kit if you want to have your way with it.

Re: Developing S/R Expert : Highly Profitable : 99 % Accuracy

@birth i am very dissappointed on you guyz attitude in this topic. a you guyz both you and soundfx should give a fellow member a little chance before playing C.S.I MIAMI. wait and see what significance a topic will be to the entire community before judging or concluding on what you think is on the owners mind. I apologise to soundfx for being aggressive. but u guyz were not being fair at all and i dont give a go ahead for things like that. if this thread had offended the whole forum upon creation then it shouldnt exist. i mean its such an embarrasment to the topic owner and makes him look like a cruck even if it was his intension or not. first give members a breathing space and watch what a progress would be like before predicting and forecasting people's mind. i dont intend to quarel with anyone but i just want you guys to take it easy with people okey :)

Everyone has the right to express their opinion and the concerns soundfx voiced were perfectly legitimate. I don't think anyone took offense at this thread. Having doubts doesn't equal being offended. As for the topic owner, he's free to post more details and make his intentions clear, which he did to some extent. It was easily clarified (in my eyes, at least) that soundfx was perfectly right with the indicator used but that harsh124 doesn't intend to sell the resulting EA.

Let me try to make a parallel. Assume I'm a relatively new user having scored a grand total of 25ish posts on the forum and I post a new thread in this section claiming that I'm working to develop an EA based on XXX strategy, which I am detailing in my post and which doesn't look bad at all. I proceed to ask people for donations to cover my living expenses during the development of the EA. Would you jump the bandwagon and just send me money or would you have doubts about my request? It's essentially the same thing if you post a strategy and ask for people to invest time by writing an EA for the it. Ultimately, no matter how you put it, time is money.

Bottom line, writing an EA requires a time investment, which is an investment nonetheless. Before going through with any investment, I find it quite natural to raise questions about the guarantees that are provided. Sure, some people might jump on it simply based on the content of the first post, but that doesn't prevent others from asking more details and posting their suspicions.

Re: FX-Mafix

The DLL is using some crypto. Each DLL seems to be locked on a mac address, so they were most likely compiling a new DLL for each new client. Educating it without a valid license would be a major pain in the a**, definitely not worth it for a martingale EA. At the very least, one would need the DLL of a legit user in conjunction with their output of ipconfig /all.