manganate

My latest results:
$5,000.00
0.1 lots
100:1
27 open positions
DD -$640
Margin 2920
Margin Level 151%
 
Looks like USDCHF is still the culprit here.

who told you that we concentrate our efforts towards one man? this is not true at all
 
Firstly, Aroman is nothing, he is a kid who happened to be able to suck in many of the ignorant crowds and if it was not for the Mods efforts
of banning him and deleting his thread people would still be falling into his fraud till the moment comes when he sucks money out of peoples pockets. As a matter of fact, some people had really fallen into his hype eventhough his scam ploy was still at what we all consider early stage and started trading with their own real money
 
Secondly, this community do expose most of the other scams I believe , except that we do not usually end up arguing with the ignorant and repeating our selfs a thousand times.
 
Thirdly, the proof I have provided is in fact a solid proof that Aroman is a low life scammer
 
Fourthly, I am done here, just stop deffending him please, if you're too ignorant to see the abvious then please just join Aroman at his website and stop posting here to deffend him. Anybody who reads this thread and decides to join him or decides to continue with him and actually ends up falling into any scam Aroman pulls off would really deserve being scammed in that case

I suspect Aroman copied it is a game with the assumption that (hopefully I'm wrong and I apologize if that happens)
1. My goal is to try to protect members of the element of foul play among the brokerage firms with someone (eg Aroman)
For example: why all the brokerage firms can not crack at him and only certain companies? Okay .. here he probably would promote such a notabena brokeragefirm been working with him to attract customers as much as possible by creating an incredible trading statement, and the thing that allows all if he cooperated
2. Why is he so closed in providing information to all members about her technique by saying "Later, the broker will know my technique and will be banned" Well know. that in any forum the company's brokers were already placing they spy forums every famous. and what happens if there is an intelligence that infiltrated into the system Aroman that .. finally my information he is also finally open for a brokerage firm. and why he was so closed in that regard .. you try to think .. why she did not immediately open it .. even become collector email address .. ?
3. If the member has collected a lot then he would suggest to open acct at a brokerage firm which he pointed, saying that brokerage firms could crack and so forth. Well at that stage the member who initially tempted to make a profit would be okay - just on the advice he's okay ..
4. if the fund member has collected a lot of brokerage firms that he was appointed, it is certainly very easy for him just to say "I'm sorry my system has been in the know all the brokers and please your own trading" and then the money the member would be in Killing by brokerage firms it .. (This is a cunning game ever occurred in Indonesia in 2007 yesterday, but I do not want to open it more) ..
4. if the fund member has collected a lot of brokerage firms that he was appointed, it is certainly very easy for him just to say "I'm sorry my system has been in the know all the brokers and please your own trading" and then the money the member would be in Killing by brokerage firms it .. (This is a cunning game ever occurred in Indonesia in 2007 yesterday, but I do not want to open it more) ..
5. When I asked him how the system works (I even asked him to do it with PM, but what he said .. he just was not happy and give antipathy .. even though I've never associated with him for this) What's all this?
6. To smooth the way Thread him, of course, he also has put up some snares of members assigned to attack anyone and help him if any who objected (eg member who objected that I know one of them and to my knowledge FXIgor FX Igor also is one Senior forum TSD and he doubted the truth of the system copied the Aroman Trade it .. but because of the Aroman already put some of the member who is the group he and others then FXIgor was heavily attacked) ..
7. If only he was honest and willing to help all members here, why when I said he would support him 100% if he's right, even the answer is an arrogance and refused to answer a word of my question, instead rewarded with hidden anger ..? What's with all this?
8. And lastly I would say to all members in this forum, never tempted by the statement that was so well .. because the statement that they belong and not belong to you, And you'd better start thinking to trade the right so that one day your account will be victorious
9. The members can just take the essence of good but do not be a follower if only based on statements alone .. because the forex is the best statement is your own statement and not others. Think about it if it is true the Aroman can do crack it on the broker, why would he want to open the secret life of her own .. I think it is impossible especially coupled with the member raising the postscript is still in the learning stage
10. Think about it ...
 
NB : I therefore just ban him for 7 days only, and I expect there is an independent member to try to ask the open trading system Aroman for him on this board alone .. and we all will test whether he is an honest or just simply use trickery

#342 Hi phasna,
Here is what I have observed:
The EA may open many positions (currently, mine has 14 open at close of business
 
Friday) and may cause a large DD. It seems to close 2 pairs at a time, when the
 
profit has reached the level you set it to in the externs.
The following work for me:
$5,000 Balance
0.1 Lots
 
After a week there are 14 positions held open, a DD of -$603, a Margin of 1560
 
and a Margin Level of 285%
 
 
#343 Hi fx4_ever,
This EA looks like it generates its own magic numbers on opening pairs of
 
trades, that is, a position is opened and assigned a magic number, then a second
 
position is opened with another magic number, and both magic numbers (and
 
positions) are related. When the 2 positions come into profit, they are closed
 
simultaneously via their magic numbers.
 
So it appears to already be doing what you are suggesting.
 
Note: I don't think there is anything wrong with having 2 USDCHF trades open in
 
the same direction, as long as they are not magic-numbered together.
 
You could write a sub-routine into the money management section to segregate a
 
portion of the account balance to be used for this EA only, but since the
 
original EA (the one I am using) has its money management based on Locked Margin
 
there would be problems. Locked Margin changes with number of positions opened
 
and is also usually Broker defined.
Hope that helps.
 
#423 Also, the various data goes into the EA, filling a set of arrays before it
 
can be used. This is why you need to leave it running for a few minutes, when
 
first starting, in order to fill the array (then allowing live).
 
#375 Hi iwjw,
I had the same problem when I started running this EA and I closed the trades.
Now I've reached the same stage - 14 open positions - but will persevere and see
 
where it takes me next week.
I think of this EA as stretching several elastic bands at once, in 3 dimensions,
 
then
trying to pull them into a specific shape (the profit) before collapsing
 
again.

#342 Hi phasna,
Here is what I have observed:
The EA may open many positions (currently, mine has 14 open at close of business
 
Friday) and may cause a large DD. It seems to close 2 pairs at a time, when the
 
profit has reached the level you set it to in the externs.
The following work for me:
$5,000 Balance
0.1 Lots
 
After a week there are 14 positions held open, a DD of -$603, a Margin of 1560
 
and a Margin Level of 285%
 
 
#343 Hi fx4_ever,
This EA looks like it generates its own magic numbers on opening pairs of
 
trades, that is, a position is opened and assigned a magic number, then a second
 
position is opened with another magic number, and both magic numbers (and
 
positions) are related. When the 2 positions come into profit, they are closed
 
simultaneously via their magic numbers.
 
So it appears to already be doing what you are suggesting.
 
Note: I don't think there is anything wrong with having 2 USDCHF trades open in
 
the same direction, as long as they are not magic-numbered together.
 
You could write a sub-routine into the money management section to segregate a
 
portion of the account balance to be used for this EA only, but since the
 
original EA (the one I am using) has its money management based on Locked Margin
 
there would be problems. Locked Margin changes with number of positions opened
 
and is also usually Broker defined.
Hope that helps.
 
#423 Also, the various data goes into the EA, filling a set of arrays before it
 
can be used. This is why you need to leave it running for a few minutes, when
 
first starting, in order to fill the array (then allowing live).
 
#375 Hi iwjw,
I had the same problem when I started running this EA and I closed the trades.
Now I've reached the same stage - 14 open positions - but will persevere and see
 
where it takes me next week.
I think of this EA as stretching several elastic bands at once, in 3 dimensions,
 
then
trying to pull them into a specific shape (the profit) before collapsing
 
again.

Settings OK
MT4 is only designed to BT one pair at a time. This EA opens more than one at a time, so BT will fail
What is your balance and leverage?
Make sure all symbols are shown in Market Watch area (right click in Market Watch area; select Show All)
Does EA show a smilie face :) at top right hand corner?

halcyonn, I already answered it previous page :)

It only represents slippage here; it may have been a corruption of the mis-spelled sleepage.
There is no sleep function in this EA.

O.K. we have to be clear about what you want to do here, and sorry if I have to bring up some basic stuff below, but it is to get the code right.
We define:
AccountEquity() as Starting Capital + Closed Positions + Open Positions
 
AccountBalance() as Starting Capital + Closed Positions (No floating trades)
 
So AccountEquity() - AccountBalance() gives us Open Positions
 
You want to know if the value of the Open Positions are greater than the Take Profits level
If so, you want to close all trades, if not you want to leave them open.
In this case the code should be:

if ((AccountEquity()-AccountBalance())>Take_Profitt)Close_All=true;
 
Note:
there is a text string further down the coding which is used to output data to the screen:

string txtAccountProfit=AccountProfit();txtAccountProfit=StringSubstr(txtAccountProfit, 0, 5);string txtAccountMargin=AccountMargin();txtAccountMargin=StringSubstr(txtAccountMargin, 0, 5);string take_p=(AccountMargin()*Take_Profitt);take_p=StringSubstr(take_p, 0, 5);
It has the formula:

take_p=(AccountMargin()*Take_Profitt);
in it from the original code. It wont affect the working of the EA when you use the substituted code above.

First: the original line of code quoted by pro was incorrect, it is in fact:

if (AccountProfit()>(AccountMargin()*Take_Profitt))Close_All=true;
with only one opening bracket after if
Otherwise, it would not compile.
 
Second: pro's changed code will compile and run, but has a set of superfluous brackets - in red below:

if ([color="red"]([/color]AccountEquity()-AccountBalance()>Take_Profitt[color="red"])[/color])Close_All=true;
 
Third: dudulalah's code will also compile and run, but it may give a different result.
Anything inside braces is calculated first, so:

(AccountBalance()>Take_Profitt)
will be calculated, then subtracted from AccountEquity()
 
Expressions are evaluated from left to right (once those in braces have been evaluated)
In pro's case:

f ((AccountEquity()-AccountBalance()>Take_Profitt))Close_All=true;
 
AccountEquity() will be subtracted from AccountBalance() then the result checked to see if it is > Take_Profitt

It only represents slippage here; it may have been a corruption of the mis-spelled sleepage.
There is no sleep function in this EA.

First: the original line of code quoted by pro was incorrect, it is in fact:

if (AccountProfit()>(AccountMargin()*Take_Profitt))Close_All=true;
with only one opening bracket after if
Otherwise, it would not compile.
 
Second: pro's changed code will compile and run, but has a set of superfluous brackets - in red below:

if ([color="red"]([/color]AccountEquity()-AccountBalance()>Take_Profitt[color="red"])[/color])Close_All=true;
 
Third: dudulalah's code will also compile and run, but it may give a different result.
Anything inside braces is calculated first, so:

(AccountBalance()>Take_Profitt)
will be calculated, then subtracted from AccountEquity()
 
Expressions are evaluated from left to right (once those in braces have been evaluated)
In pro's case:

f ((AccountEquity()-AccountBalance()>Take_Profitt))Close_All=true;
 
AccountEquity() will be subtracted from AccountBalance() then the result checked to see if it is > Take_Profitt

It only represents slippage here; it may have been a corruption of the mis-spelled sleepage.
There is no sleep function in this EA.

Ok lets get serious here..
 
Iam getting lots of PM's asking me to share the other EA's i have for other pairs. Let me make it quite clear here..Dont ask me for these as its quite clear many cant even work out MT4 correctly or follow simple instructions as posted to make what they have work let alone another 3.
 
To summarize here..
 
Get the latest version from post 1.
Follow the instructions from post 1 to the letter.
 
Post 171 explains how the TP is worked out.
 
Deltas of 300 will produce more trades but will go into more DD and stay open longer in this DD.
Deltas of 350 will produce less trades and DD wont be as big as deltas 300 and wont be open longer either.
Deltas 400 will produce even less trades again but DD wont be very big but you could miss out on some good profits.
 
Make sure you test it on demo 1st before live.
 
Look at your journal for errors as it will let you know if anything is wrong.
 
Pro has offered solution for hard stop to run with other EA's on same account.
 
Read over all posts up to this point.
 
If you cant do this then i really dont know what to say. It works by just following these steps. Anything else is your platform..your computer..your broker. Try a different demo broker will let you know if your platform is causing the grief. Also maybe delete all data history for the pairs then reopen the platform and open the trading pairs one by one on 1hr chart to reload the data back. this can fix data errors.
 
It will not trade every day so be patient. It might sit dormant for 3-4 days waiting or it could consistently take trades daily.
 
After you get it working then by all means keep others posted with your success as this will help build confidence in running this EA. Dont just sit there and make profits but let nobody know..This is secret squirrel stuff.
 
There has been over 200 downloads of this EA and only a handful of people helping out here or posting success and this is what i have previously mentioned before that ticks me off. And this is the Main reason i will not post other EA's like this as i seem to be feeding the greedy for there own purpose to just take and not offer back weather it be small changes or platform issues.
 
Maybe these people have nothing to contribute but i see it differently..Just a quick hey it closed out profit today with delta XXX is good enough for everybody.
 
If the brokers dont attack this EA and we get plenty of help in here then i might release the others in due time.But until then if you follow these instructions then it will work out.
 
If you are going to post chart also try and include the journal bit as well so we can see if there are any errors..But before then try a different platform 1st..This will really tell you whats going on.

Campbell touted one of his courses recently: 90 day forex trading bootcamp live.
He implied there would be many trading opportunities to follow; there were few.
He encouraged ppl to open a $200 account at eToro through his link, with the incentive that they would receive half of everything he made in a similar account at the end of the 90 days. Of course, no one received anything from him (even though he had contact details).
 
Would you trust someone with that pedigree?

You will need to put the suffix in all symbol extern values, including both USDCAD externs. Also, you have to put suffix here:
 

if (cross0[x]=="USDJPY") M0=100; if (cross=="USDJPY")M=100;
 
It should work on ECN because the sendorder() has sl=0 and tp=0

Hey guys..
 
Iam getting private messages from people asking interesting questions..
 
Is this a fly by night EA for short term
I should remove it as its too good and anybody can trade with it
Why am i posting
 
You get the idea..
 
answer to 1st question..Is it fly by night EA..
 
Its not a commercial Ea so that helps..I have been around this forum now for over 2 years..In that time i have seem many..i mean many EA's and manual Systems posted whipping up everybody into a frenzy of excitement to only be a short term thing..This is trading..You have to adapt to market conditions to succeed long term..Is this EA a long term thing..Iam sure you will find that out..all you can do is put these things out there and if u like it use it..if not throw it away..
 
Answer to 2nd question..Remove it..its too good..
 
Yes its Very good but greed will kill most with too big lot size. If you really want i can package it up and sell it if that makes you feel better. You know how many of the commercial EA's out there have been packaged up and sold from people in this forum and other forums..Most Ea's out there are a function of someone else's work through a public forum and kept to themselves..Is really is anybody's motive to help anybody..or is it just to make people think they are helping but in reality nothing good gets given back..This is my contribution for all the good i have received.
 
Question 3..why post..
 
To stop someone selling it..simple..and also i got annoyed when i asked for help by 2 programmers in projects that work very well but got turned away..If i was a Gold Member then u seem to have validity and you must know what u are doing..lol Color means nothing so this is a slap in the face to these guys to show them iam not a newbie in this market..8 years experience u get to learn a few things..And no these aren't the projects i wanted help with..its just something i put out there for EVERYBODY to enjoy..not just the programmers out there..
 
So if you like these then use them..modify them..keep them to yourself if thats what u want to do..i just put it out there.
 
There are 5 versions of this one i have posted..others are for different crosses qith different functions as if u put this on anything other than USDJPY then do so at your peril..Will the others get shared also..It depends will have to waite and see
 
Please Enjoy and do your test and share in here with others and i might post all 5..but keep to yourself and thats all u get..

It seems to be more difficult to ban on II these days.
One thing which is worse than profanity/discrimination, etc., is the ability of someone to lead others up the garden path to a promised end and not deliver.
At what point do you decide to ban such a person? I would be interested to read your comments; they may also be useful to the mods in helping to gauge the attitude of members.
Do you ban on past activity (e.g. threads closed for not keeping to the subject and just ranting)?
Do you ban on non-delivery after x number of posts?
Do you ban after members have asked reasonable questions about the system/software, etc., and been fobbed off, or even abused?
 
I find it extraordinary that a self-appointed guru can rant rubbish and have what appears to be a major following of desperate ppl who ignore reason at all costs. Yet, this is what seems to be happening here, today, at II.
 
You could easily argue that it is their own choice and responsibility. But when they get burned, the finger will point to II and the question will be asked: Why was a ban not imposed?

Hi scwon,
That is not my intention.
I was asking for opinions and giving my own at the same time. That is all.

we'd love you to stay. and love everyone just to stick to the sharing and analysing the usefulness of the tools available. simple. for internet flame wars go join 4chan or something. for trading tools and EAs stay here.

Today I share with my Indo friends my proprietary Trend Pullback System. I have been working on it for a long time and think it's pretty special. It is a range bar system and has the uncanny ability to often identify the exact bottom bar in a countertrend pullback and enter on the open of the next bar! From an entry standpoint, it doesn't get much better...
 
Here are some recent charts. The arrows are mechanically placed by the system and not repaint:
 
 
http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w201/jtimpsonstamps/signals.gif
 
 
http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w201/jtimpsonstamps/signals2.gif
 
 
http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w201/jtimpsonstamps/signals3.gif
 
 
Of course, nothing's perfect. There are rare times like the following where the market is choppy. Any suggestions dealing with "Choppy Market" appreciated.
 
 
http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w201/jtimpsonstamps/choppy.gif
 
 
Here is the system itself, with all the indicators, a template and a word document that fully describes the system and how to set it up on your Metatrader 4 chart.
 

http://www.multiupload.com/M89SOFKNJV
 
You are all welcome to use it with my compliments! But if you use it, I am not responsible. Also you may not sell it.
 
I am happy to share with you all. I have a top level coder who I will be paying to potentially create an EA starting
Thursday. I hope that you all will take a close look at this system and suggest improvements. Particularly I am interested in things like Trade Management and filtering of bad signals. Any ideas appreciated. Now is the time to do it, before the EA specialist begins. Oh, by the way, if it works out OK, I will be sharing the EA to all the folks here with my compliments so let's make this the best system ever !
 
Diesel10
 
 
PS My sincere thanks to Indo brothers Stovedude, Alright and Musketeer for their able assistance along the way !

Sorry about that. Try this one: http://www.multiupload.com/0HYA8WL2QT
 

Hi conglo,
I think Tazz was referring to this:
 
 

http://indo-investasi.com/showthread.php/12368-%28Req%29-SportsInvesting-Software-Arb

Campbell touted one of his courses recently: 90 day forex trading bootcamp live.
He implied there would be many trading opportunities to follow; there were few.
He encouraged ppl to open a $200 account at eToro through his link, with the incentive that they would receive half of everything he made in a similar account at the end of the 90 days. Of course, no one received anything from him (even though he had contact details).
 
Would you trust someone with that pedigree?

Programming Subroutines
 
I would like to suggest having a section for specific subroutines, such as order entry, money management and code snippets which could be developed and optimized here by members.
These blocks could then be standardized to fit together, without code disruption, to form mql4 EAs.
Each snippet would explain what it did and how it would be plugged in.
This would allow anyone to continuously develop a snippet and allow others to slot the new version into their EA without a problem.
A growing snippet bank would hopefully encourage ppl to build "LEGO" EAs that they would never have considered before, or help turn a manual strategy into an automatic one to see if it works.
 
It may also entice ppl who are afraid of programming to experiment with blocks of code which are known to work.
 
Even subroutines in some of the decompiled garbage EAs posted here may be useful if properly modified!!!