[share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

[forexample]

I do not like conspiracy theories but it seems that each new version of xxxf@pturb0xxx gets worse.

 

First it was the "randomizer"...before that all accounts got the same good trades. Now every account is different, it doesn't seem to obey the rules...lots of little things.

 

Maybe they made a deal with broker, maybe the market conditions have changed, maybe the are preparing for new EA's release...who knows. The only way to know for sure is to run original version beside new one and check over time.

 

Here is the Version 16 decompiled...can someone please educate, and I will run new educated version, paid version and this original version on 3 different live accounts and compare results.

 

Thank you "starting" for decompile, and coder...thank you in advance. Maybe this is the only """xF@Px""" that still works...

 

http://depositfiles.com/files/ezmdcowym

[Starting]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

I do not like conspiracy theories but it seems that each new version of xxxf@pturb0xxx gets worse.

 

First it was the "randomizer"...before that all accounts got the same good trades. Now every account is different, it doesn't seem to obey the rules...lots of little things.

 

Maybe they made a deal with broker, maybe the market conditions have changed, maybe the are preparing for new EA's release...who knows. The only way to know for sure is to run original version beside new one and check over time.

 

Here is the Version 16 decompiled...can someone please educate, and I will run new educated version, paid version and this original version on 3 different live accounts and compare results.

 

Thank you "starting" for decompile, and coder...thank you in advance. Maybe this is the only """xF@Px""" that still works...

 

http://depositfiles.com/files/ezmdcowym

 

Thanks to our expert who has made f160 edu for your testing:

http://depositfiles.com/files/ly8hy8wl9

[forexample]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

:-bd Thank you indeed!

 

A question - this does not include a dll file...should we use the original or none at all?

[forexample]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

^:)^ Will reply with info as to whether they're trading differently around the end of July after gathering a decent data range.

[saendee]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

HEARS ANOTHER \m/DLL __http://www.mediafire.com/?m2ntcjcui52___Cracked__http://www.mediafire.com/?t54fzgyfzmh___ENJOY -TRY THIS 1 TOO AND COMPARE ;))

[myffxdonos]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

hOW DID YOU CRACK THE DLL. wITH WICH PROGRAM DID YOU DECOMPILE OR DISSASABLE THE DLL?

CAN YOU TEACH ME THAT?

[Stormin_Norman]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

hOW DID YOU CRACK THE DLL. wITH WICH PROGRAM DID YOU DECOMPILE OR DISSASABLE THE DLL?

CAN YOU TEACH ME THAT?

 

i dont think they did. its more likely that the code in the mq4 file was altered to remove the checking of the time and or account details.

 

btw, your caps lock is on.

[saendee]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

:shand: I DO NOT KNOW I FOUND THE **EA** ON ANOTHER SITE :)) BUT WILL TRY & FIND ** AS LONG AS IT STILL WORKS THAT IS THE MORE IMPORTANT** AS I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THIS PAID FOR VERSION THAT HAS MADE SOME PEOPLE $4 MILLION DOLLARS MAY BE THEY WILL NOW !!???? WILL BE GETTING PAID BY BROKERS TO RELEASE **BAD UPDATES WITH BIGGER SPREAD ** ONLY A THOUGHT =)) TEST :-bd

[saendee]

Re: [share] Original "F@P-TUrb0" v.16

 

^:)^ 1 LAST THOUGHT **MAYBE SOMEBODY CAN DECOMPILE THE **dll ** :)) :-??___ENJOY :shand: