jonnyrich007

Please stop requoting the **** from hyped up website OK? All the info on there are bogus. Now, taking the decompiled code and really trying to improve it might be worthwhile but requoting hyped up sales pitch from sales page is not.

Why do people keep harping for backtests. Backtests are also useless.

Again, I am talking about Plimus; and they are as crooked as they come. And anyone who chooses Plimus as a payment processor when there are a ton of other decent processors are highly suspect as well. And that also has been proven about TulipFX. Vendors like TulipFX would be banned by ClickBank probably within a year due to complaints and high refund rates. But Plimus do not care. In fact, Plimus will help them keep their money by trying their best not to honor refunds from customers. And Plimus allows their crooked vendors to create 2 or 3 separate landing pages that has different subscription rates. Everything they do and allow are crooked and shady. So keep on defending them as if I am the only person who think they are crooks.

Guess I'm still not understanding what you are saying about the 007 issue but I use Jayman007 at every forum I have complained about this issue. Not sure what 2nd hidden ID you keep referring to.

 

And if there are no secrets then who is Tulip? You did some checking around (your words) so who are they?

 

And if you don't see the clear failing pattern in Kangaroo then I invite you to check out Birts statement here

 

http://www.myfxbook.com/members/birt/kangarooea/67781

 

If he did some checking on TulipFX and Plimus, he would have clearly seen that a ton of people are not happy with them. He researched what exactly and on what forums? ha ha. Right... only two people in this entire world is unhappy with Plimus. And he says he researched? ha ha. ha ha.

 

Don't fool people into thinking Plimus is some upstanding payment processor. They rip off both the vendors and the customers.

And they go out of their way not to process refunds. And that's the truth.

It's bad enough defending TulipFX but he is defending Plimus as well? Just too pathetic for words.

How can anyone be that paranoid yet defend Plimus? ha ha. Utterly pathetic.

Stop playing games, jonnyrich007 and jayman007 are the ONLY two IDs that have complained about Tullipfx refund processing on ALL public forums

 

You know exactly what I am talking about

 

You are one pathetic moron aren't you? It is becoming quite evident. I suggest that you shut up right now before you become the #1 fool on this forum.

It is beyond silliness to defend Plimus when the person has zero experience actually getting refunds from Plimus. I hate pathetic babble the most. Researched Plimus on forums? Why do some people insist on defending Plimus? You think people hate PayPal? Look up Plimus instead!

csa1234,

This is not the last version.

 

Thank you.

 

It doesn't matter what version it is, it still is same garbage peddled by the same crook.

I think is not the same EA but http://magicfxrobot.com/ (slave e master)

 

We is possible to find forex ea super?

 

Not only is the same ****, it is peddled by the same crook.

You are honestly asking someone to throw away their money on this EA? Why? It is a sure thing Plimus won't give a refund. There actually is 90%+ chance that Plimus won't give a refund.

 

Check for reviews on forexfbi first from actual buyers before begging someone to buy it and decompile it.

ouch.... lets see all the supporters come here and blame the market for this.

 

As long as they don't defend Plimus, I am fine with their ostrich like mentality. Ya, let's see them trying to get Plimus to cancel their subscriptions. They'll be forced to report their credit card stolen instead.

Spoken like a true airhead. I knew some airhead would think that 007 users are all the same people. The point is, you have zero experience with Plimus. That totally makes all of your comments irrelevant!! So utterly irrelevant, one would think that you are some Plimus or TulipFX supporter. You have no experience with Plimus yet how do you know that everyone got refunds from Plimus? You just base your opinion on herasay spewed by Plimus and TulipFX? Only one person hasn't got a refund eh? Says who? Plimus? And Plimus gives refunds outside of 60 day window? Nope. Only after much constant threats and threat of lawsuits do they give out refunds after 60 days. All they do is regurgitate their policies in emails. What exactly did you witness? Yet you have no personal experience with Plimus. That fact again, invalidates your babble. Make no mistake and don't make Plimus look like some saints... they are crooked. Agenda against Plimus? Are you serious? What is truly odd is people with zero personal experience with Plimus talking nonsense. Any other simpletons on here utterly incapable of intelligent independent thinking? Wow... only people with 007 in their names complain about Plimus? Pathetic.

FX market, much less the EURUSD market, is too huge for couple thousand FAPturbo's mostly losing traders to affect the market in any way.

The thing is, EA or automated application of a sound trading strategy is not the problem. Commercial hacks peddling **** and ripping people off are the problem. Just study enough decompiled stuff on here, learn and make some strategy your own, and then program your own on top of manually trading your strategies. Commercial EAs sold is not the solution. Study decompiled ones and make it better and write your own. Crooks hang out on forums like this as well looking for EAs some nice guy is handing out for free... these crooks then just package it and then sell it. This is why no sane programmer will release his own excellent EAs to the public or sell them because they know it will be decompiled to death and crooks will just repackage it and sell it.

Many people have gotten so many affiliate and get rich quick spams from Henry over the years, including me that I laughed my a** off when he started selling EAs. What a joke. There was no need to even investigate this from Henry.

The fact is, Plimus are very shady group of people. And people using them with ton of flimsy excuses are highly suspect as well. And that's a fact that all newbies should be made aware of. What is consistent reporting of non-refunds anyway? Most people just give up on them because they are very tenacious about not giving refunds or cancelling subscriptions. Only way is to prepare to report your card stolen. There are a ton of other reputable processors even for those vendors with zero or lousy credit but they time and time again choose Plimus? Why? Precisely because they will help crooked vendors along because Plimus themselves are crooked. And like I said, you don't know what Plimus does unless you have personally been screwed by them. So unless you have had personal experience with Plimus, you cannot comment on Plimus whatsoever.

Potential buyers must be aware of Plimus. Plimus is the primary problem here. And Plimus will aways be the problem. I have had my share of nightmare with Plimus and so has other people. Trying to get a refund or get your subscription cancelled is a huge headache. It really is. And I have to always seriously question vendors choosing Plimus. Why do they choose Plimus over ClickBank or getting their own bank credit card processing? Easy. ClickBank processes refunds automatically for the most part, and ClickBank is run honestly and it always kicks out vendors whose refund rate and lack of customer service is through the roof. But these vendors' financial situation and credit sucks so badly that they are incapable of getting a credit card processing through a bank or other reputable CC processing companies. So they pick Plimus. Listen, be honest with others about Plimus and vendors choosing Plimus. That's a fact; not some opinion. Choose Plimus and Plimus using vendors at your own risk and never defend Plimus and vendors choosing Plimus. EA itself may be separate issue but the vendor is choosing Plimus. That alone, to me, makes the vendor highly suspicious and that was proven right hasn't it?

 

People who use Plimus are highly suspect and those who defend Plimus are highly suspect. Again, fact, not mere opinion. You won't know how bad Plimus is until you really need and want a refund or must cancel a subscription. They are crooks so they attract crooked and credit-less vendors. Again, fact; not opinion.

 

Their EA can get stronger only if they cut out the forum shenanigan and stop using Plimus. Seeing a Plimus payment page probably is turning off 99% of the potential buyers.

 

Support a vendor using Plimus? That must be a joke of a commentary right? It is!!!!!!!

Forex arbitrage is a myth. In a real forex market battlefield, nobody can take advantage of a very small arbitrage window. Besides, nobody can tell you which is the correct price for a pair and it would differ according to the liquidity provider that is being used.

 

And after having looked at the site and myfxbook, it is a demo account most likely. You have to have your trading privilege verified which is a very easy thing to do on myfxbook or mt4i. Plus, it is PayPal processing. Refund is a difficult thing on there. This type of extreme scalping won't be profitable for anyone. Not even worth a look in my view.

Ya, good catch. This shady peddler has two landing pages. One for $37 per month and one for $37 per week. Plus this is a Plimus and a subscription. You will have almost next to impossible time getting refunds or getting your subscription cancelled short of just closing your credit card acct. So watch the sales page very carefully whenever you buy anything.

You are quoting 1clickpips website? Guys who now got kicked out by ClickBank and now peddling their garbage on Plimus? It is not by default a high-frequency scalper. And the paid version is the same thing as the ones decompiled and loaded on forums.

 

And way too many people seem to be still confused by STP and ECN. All ECNs are also STP but not all STPs are ECNs. And vast majority of STPs also do not allow you to scalp for 2 PIPs. They have minimum take profit they allow on their platforms. While ECNs will even allow you to do a 1 PIP take profit since you are paying a commission + raw spreads on every transaction whether you make money or not.

I am being hostile? You are defending garbage. The worst part of this outright crooked peddled EA is this... the willy nilly reversal of direction closure of trade to open yet another losing trade. And on that $10,000 demo account and after all that time wasted you didn't even make $1!!! Even if your equity was ahead $1 million it wouldn't mean nothing as well? What is your problem anyway? What is your logic? What is your thinking? So 50 cents mean something but $1 million won't mean anything? You are telling other people who clearly see this as garbage to wake up? This concept is good? Really? You could lower it to 4 PIPs and it would still do lousy precisely due to the reverse closure thing this EA does over and over again. Do you have to bash your head into the wall for years to see things immediately and clearly? This thing showed its true colors very quickly. It is only capable of slowly draining your account. That should be painfully obvious. There is nothing here worth adjusting... this is a very simple moving average EA and then willy nilly exits that trade if that reverses even if that is merely 10 PIPs in DD only to open yet another losing trade. It also closes that if it reverses again. Just creating a ton of 10-20 PIPs losers. And as you saw in your own demo, when SL hits, it's over. You will never recover. You won't accumulate a thing with a small TP and you certainly won't have time to recover with a huge TP either. There is nothing to tweak or adjust in this EA OK? Once again, the nonsense you talk about has NOTHING TO DO WITH MONEY MANAGEMENT because all of the nonsense you talk about is under your control with the Xtreme version. It is not the EA's MM that is at fault here. When you can set all the pertinent parameters, you cannot then say the EA's money management needs work. Now, if you see a nice ratio of wins to losses and you still have a healthy equity, you can then say it has promise but look around. People are only losing and it is slowly draining their account. And you still insist that this has promise? He probably posted a bogus report? Are you kidding me? He logs into a 5 digit account only to wind up on a 4 digit account. But that can be overlooked if this EA actually performs but it doesn't. This is a slow account drainer no matter what settings you use. And the concept is good because it can trade all currency pairs? So can a ton of other EAs. This fails as a scalper and also fails as a long-term EA. It fails every which way. Don't talk about MM again. You sound like a pure amateur. If the EA had auto-MM and we had no control of the parameters, then you can babble on and on about MM. MM talk does not apply here if you are going to attribute it to the EA itself. But no matter what you tweak, this will slowly drain your account. Don't tell nonsense to people on here especially if they are looking for some honest evaluations. You are telling them to waste more time with settings? I guess you enjoy wasting time.

 

Oh, and as countless other people mentioned, the transaction IDs don't match either. Again, all can be overlooked if this performs but it doesn't. Don't tell people to waste 1 month of their life with this. Now, that is true arrogance. You can tell within 24 hours if something has value or not. Then you take it to a 1 week test if 24 hour test shows promise. Otherwise, you discard it and move on rather than tweak the settings for yet another month of time wasting. Be honest with people rather than sugar coat things because you want to defend your position.

It just goes in the indicator folder. The main EA uses it.

Stop whining and begging already. Sheesh.

It is clear why it was made subscription based so it probably is server signal based. It is decompile proof. If you are interested, just do the first month free trial instead. That is offered by the vendor. And it appears to be straight grid trader. No Martingale involved.

Profitable???

 

Opinions differ in this instance. Take a look at the screenshot of the xtreme trades. Except for the 2 larger losses you can see that trades are generally profitable. Over longer term this could continue or it could fall on its face. Hard to tell what will happen.

 

http://i56.tinypic.com/s0ygj4.jpg

 

Cheers

 

You call this profitable? Look at the number of trades only to be mostly wiped out by two loser trades. This is why if you are going to approach this with scalper approach, SL must be equally tight or like I said, you are spinning wheels and wasting time. All that to make not even $1??? Spinning wheels and a great time waster. The fact is, again as I said and as noticed by others, reverse trade trade closures only to open up yet another loser going in the opposite direction is the main problem with this EA. This is why most trades will be losing trades. Now, if you want to use this to scalp, SL should be much tighter and TP should be no more than 15 points (1.5 PIPs) at most. But then, you are wasting time unless this EA is capable of doing 10,000+ trades per month because you will be paying most of your earning through commissions. So scalper approach won't work with this EA, TP has to be substantially bigger but reverse logic trade closures will result in most of your trades being closed out because it most likely won't make it to see the TP target. You could use a tight TS but that's no better than the scalper approach. How can you show this statement and say it is and can be profitable? This is a time waster. And will eventually slowly drain your account even if you scalp. And if you to a TP of bigger values, it will drain it quicker. This is a sad example to show for a $10,000 deposit demo. To think otherwise, you are not being realistic. Are you saying you would be happy if this was your live trading account? All that to barely make over 50 cents???