German

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

Hi SoundFX
 
 
There have been 14 trades, ranging from 19-31 pips in very fast moves, and a pullback of about 17 pips (stop)
 
If you study the move that occurred today at around 2:00 AM EST, it is typical of this type of trade, and all conditions I listed in my other posted were present.
 
This is about as simple an answer I can give without going off topic here on your thread, as I do not want to bring in other items about trading ( such as S&R, double and triple tops and bottom) that would pollute this thread.
 
 
Also I only trade 1 hr before London open , reading news and setting up if I see a move I take it before the actual Londo open at 3:00 AM EST, till the London Fixing at 11:00 AM EST

Hi SoundFX
 
 
There have been 14 trades, ranging from 19-31 pips in very fast moves, and a pullback of about 17 pips (stop)
 
If you study the move that occurred today at around 2:00 AM EST, it is typical of this type of trade, and all conditions I listed in my other posted were present.
 
This is about as simple an answer I can give without going off topic here on your thread, as I do not want to bring in other items about trading ( such as S&R, double and triple tops and bottom) that would pollute this thread.
 
 
Also I only trade 1 hr before London open , reading news and setting up if I see a move I take it before the actual Londo open at 3:00 AM EST, till the London Fixing at 11:00 AM EST

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

Here is a site that will help you very much and clear up time zones issue, keep it handy its great. I am in New York so its 3:00 AM here when its 8 AM at that London open.
 
But use this link it works great
 
http://www.worldtimezone.com/

Hello Diesel 10/ others
 
I just recently had a good friend of mine share this speedometer with me, but I have not had time myself to install it or test it.
 
He did mention that there's a problem with the basic version but the Pro version he explained to me works just great.
 
Both version are included in the share link below, Let me know how it turns out for you. Enjoy
 
 
 
http://hotfile.com/dl/128420184/a8d5ce6/speedOmeter_Pro.zip.html

There are times when some of you are not at able to be at your computer, and are not able to see certain readings or indicators given off signals and see their behavior.
 
Below is a link to a free and easy to use desktop recording software. It's very easy to use and completely free.
 
I use it to record my desktop when I am testing a system and do not have time to monitor it, I can later review it.
 
I provided the link below for anyone who wishes to download it, also the website explain vey very easy steps on how to use it.
 
http://goview.com/goldwyn/spring/play?method=indexPage

Hi Soundfx and Others:
 
During the past week and including today Monday August 29th, a period of extreme volatility on the Euro/Usd within a range of 1.4550 down to 1.4300
 
I have observed an interesting correlation between the Master Probability reading/ ALL TF Master Probability and the currency strength meter
 
If you take the time to observe the two side-by-side, you will notice that once the Master Probability AND ALSO the ALL TF Master Probability reading gets above a output of 35-38.
 
The currency strength meter is also showing readings between for the Euro at 8+ against a USD reading of 2 or less indicating strength and that a breakout may be imminent.
 
Keep your eyes on this event it seems to be a very good trading opportunity; you can also try and test it with a fractal breakout, or even with volatility stops. But is an exercise in futility once the reading from the Master Probability and ALL TF Master Probability builds up to the levels I've described above and the currency meters reads with the numbers I've listed which in essence is a five point spread between the two readings. The move from what I have observed over the time span that I have mentioned breaks out with lots of momentum.

Hi Soundfx and Others:
 
During the past week and including today Monday August 29th, a period of extreme volatility on the Euro/Usd within a range of 1.4550 down to 1.4300
 
I have observed an interesting correlation between the Master Probability reading/ ALL TF Master Probability and the currency strength meter
 
If you take the time to observe the two side-by-side, you will notice that once the Master Probability AND ALSO the ALL TF Master Probability reading gets above a output of 35-38.
 
The currency strength meter is also showing readings between for the Euro at 8+ against a USD reading of 2 or less indicating strength and that a breakout may be imminent.
 
Keep your eyes on this event it seems to be a very good trading opportunity; you can also try and test it with a fractal breakout, or even with volatility stops. But is an exercise in futility once the reading from the Master Probability and ALL TF Master Probability builds up to the levels I've described above and the currency meters reads with the numbers I've listed which in essence is a five point spread between the two readings. The move from what I have observed over the time span that I have mentioned breaks out with lots of momentum.

What a bunch of bull.
 
Over way too many years I've seen this way too many times.
 
 
Add this. Add that. Change this to that, and change that other thing while you're at it.
 
 
The original rules work, so stick to them and just tweak them a little.
 
Stop trying to turn this into something it's not.
 
This kind of BS eventually begins with every new decent method and you (all) always end up turning it into a LOSER.
 
 
Sorry, soundfx, you're doing the yeoman's work here but while the "committee" idea sounds good in principle it does not seem to work well in practice.

Hi German,
 
Ok - you've convinced me that we need to improve on these parameters :)
 
I've changed the parameters as follows:
 
"== Arrow Determination =="
ArrowMACDx - Draws arrow when MACD main crosses MACD signal
ArrowMACD0 - Draws arrow when MACD main crosses the 0 line
ArrowProb - Draws arrow when probability reaches one of your defined levels
ArrowMACDxProb - Draws arrow when MACD main/signal crosses and then subsequently probability reaches one of your defined levels
ArrowMACD0Prob - Draws arrow when MACD main crosses 0 and then subsequently probability reaches one of your defined levels
 
We have a similar bunch of options for Alerts.
 
I've removed the "Real-time" option as that's potentially confusing. Whenever we calculate arrows which are in any way associated with probability then by default we will be in "real-time" mode and the arrow history and boxes will only start being drawn from the time you add the indicator to the chart.
 
If you want to see historical boxes and arrows immediately then set either ArrowMACDx or ArrowMACD0 to true and leave all the probability based arrow settings to false.
 
I've not been able to test all options, though here's the new version if you want to try it out:
 

http://www.multiupload.com/3RML9A4XE9

While I completely understand what you are saying relating “too many arrows”.
 
To the best of my knowledge, there still is no way to forward test different Master Probability settings in all three options.
 
The arrow that appears if nothing more than a signal from the Mac-D line in all user optons as you know,
 
We have no arrow that prints for any given reading from the Master Probability so forward testing different settings is impossible with different setting, if one was to leave the MT4 running on different computers.
 
So at a minimum, I think that an arrow just for the Master Probability reading output to forward test is a good idea.

Hi German,
 

 
You already have the option of setting the arrow as it is now or setting it to trigger only when MACD has crossed the signal and probability lines up with the user input levels.
 
I'm not sure if it's a good idea idea to add more arrows. All these arrows are getting messy - particularly when we have to decide which we want alerts to appear on. Do we really need 3 different arrows for each signal?
 
Sometimes MACD crossing 0 can be a good signal and waiting for it can enable us to miss retracements and jump into a trade with the main momentum, though other times when MACD has crossed 0, the move has already gone and when we jump in we're likely to get stopped out by a reversal.
 
In my view both the MACD crossing 0 and the MACD cross signal + probability alerts are both generally too late for manual trading. The alert should ring when we get a normal MACD main/signal cross, and then it's up to the trader whether they wait for a retracement or a particular probability level etc.
 
I can look into adding more arrows, though I don't think these can be turned on and off with normal parameter swtiches. The indicator colours by default can't be invisible I believe, which means that if you don't want to see arrows then you'll have to set the colour to "none" in the indicator parameters. However the indicator colour works separately from the main code, so we can still have alert "switches" in the main parameters which apply to MACD signal cross, MACD 0 cross and MACD cross + probability level reached.
 
That final option would need to cover both types of MACD cross I guess, either that or we create another alert type to cover both MACD signal cross + probability level reached and MACD 0 cross + probability level reached.
 
I think that rather than messing around with more arrows we should be thinking outside the original system parameters. We've already done that by calculating probabilities on different timeframes - confluence of these is worth looking at first.
 
The next thing we're going to want is an alert and/or arrow when all timeframe probabilties line up and MACD has crossed the signal line lol. So the fewer arrows and alerts we have the in first place the better ;)

Hi Soundfx
 
What are the odds of this indicator being modified to print arrows when the Master Probability output number is reached, which is defined by the user as been reached? Along with the pop up we currently have at the time of this event taking place
 
Along with the arrow that is printed from the 24- 52-18 Macd signal line.
 
 
Also I'm quite surprised that the topic hasn't been mentioned before, but we know that the arrows on the chart are generated when the 24-52-18 Macd signal line is crossed. Which at times are an early warning or preempt before the cross of the zero line
 
But when this slower Macd 24-52-18 actually crosses the zero line in the direction of the arrow is when we seem to have the highest volatility, I know that during fast moves it could be several bars before the actual Macd 24-52-18 crosses the zero line with these slower settings.
 
But nevertheless looking at the Macd with these settings and seeing approximately how far from the actual zero line cross could eliminate many of these false signals.
 
Problem is that you have to have the Mac installed on your charts with the 24-52-18 setting.
 
But just an idea, is there a possiblably to code a secondary arrow with pop up , which could be color-coded from a user-defined color choice that would identify the actual breach of the zero line ?
 
I think it would be best, if its possible that, to have the arrow and alert coded on an “Inter-Candle” bases and not on the close of the candle, because we could lose several pips if there is a strong momentum move. This could avoid having the actual Macd loaded on the charts,
 
I know it’s a lot of work but, I think these three ideas could eliminate many false signals.
 
Of course Soundfx, as you have already mention users have to be aware of the overall trend on the larger time frames and were the price action sits in relationship to the user’s core system that they've actually been using before this indicator came on the market to make their final trade decision.
 
This is just an attempt to try and weed out false signals that would go contrary to the user’s core system and attempt to move forward with the development of your work.
 
So in essence we would have the original single line cross as we have it now, there would be an additional secondary arrow with a zero line breach of the original MACD setting. Then finally there would be a third arrow when the Master Probability user input number is reached.

Hi Soundfx
 
What are the odds of this indicator being modified to print arrows when the Master Probability output number is reached, which is defined by the user as been reached? Along with the pop up we currently have at the time of this event taking place
 
Along with the arrow that is printed from the 24- 52-18 Macd signal line.
 
 
Also I'm quite surprised that the topic hasn't been mentioned before, but we know that the arrows on the chart are generated when the 24-52-18 Macd signal line is crossed. Which at times are an early warning or preempt before the cross of the zero line
 
But when this slower Macd 24-52-18 actually crosses the zero line in the direction of the arrow is when we seem to have the highest volatility, I know that during fast moves it could be several bars before the actual Macd 24-52-18 crosses the zero line with these slower settings.
 
But nevertheless looking at the Macd with these settings and seeing approximately how far from the actual zero line cross could eliminate many of these false signals.
 
Problem is that you have to have the Mac installed on your charts with the 24-52-18 setting.
 
But just an idea, is there a possiblably to code a secondary arrow with pop up , which could be color-coded from a user-defined color choice that would identify the actual breach of the zero line ?
 
I think it would be best, if its possible that, to have the arrow and alert coded on an “Inter-Candle” bases and not on the close of the candle, because we could lose several pips if there is a strong momentum move. This could avoid having the actual Macd loaded on the charts,
 
I know it’s a lot of work but, I think these three ideas could eliminate many false signals.
 
Of course Soundfx, as you have already mention users have to be aware of the overall trend on the larger time frames and were the price action sits in relationship to the user’s core system that they've actually been using before this indicator came on the market to make their final trade decision.
 
This is just an attempt to try and weed out false signals that would go contrary to the user’s core system and attempt to move forward with the development of your work.
 
So in essence we would have the original single line cross as we have it now, there would be an additional secondary arrow with a zero line breach of the original MACD setting. Then finally there would be a third arrow when the Master Probability user input number is reached.

Hi Soundfx
 
What are the odds of this indicator being modified to print arrows when the Master Probability output number is reached, which is defined by the user as been reached? Along with the pop up we currently have at the time of this event taking place
 
Along with the arrow that is printed from the 24- 52-18 Macd signal line.
 
 
Also I'm quite surprised that the topic hasn't been mentioned before, but we know that the arrows on the chart are generated when the 24-52-18 Macd signal line is crossed. Which at times are an early warning or preempt before the cross of the zero line
 
But when this slower Macd 24-52-18 actually crosses the zero line in the direction of the arrow is when we seem to have the highest volatility, I know that during fast moves it could be several bars before the actual Macd 24-52-18 crosses the zero line with these slower settings.
 
But nevertheless looking at the Macd with these settings and seeing approximately how far from the actual zero line cross could eliminate many of these false signals.
 
Problem is that you have to have the Mac installed on your charts with the 24-52-18 setting.
 
But just an idea, is there a possiblably to code a secondary arrow with pop up , which could be color-coded from a user-defined color choice that would identify the actual breach of the zero line ?
 
I think it would be best, if its possible that, to have the arrow and alert coded on an “Inter-Candle” bases and not on the close of the candle, because we could lose several pips if there is a strong momentum move. This could avoid having the actual Macd loaded on the charts,
 
I know it’s a lot of work but, I think these three ideas could eliminate many false signals.
 
Of course Soundfx, as you have already mention users have to be aware of the overall trend on the larger time frames and were the price action sits in relationship to the user’s core system that they've actually been using before this indicator came on the market to make their final trade decision.
 
This is just an attempt to try and weed out false signals that would go contrary to the user’s core system and attempt to move forward with the development of your work.
 
So in essence we would have the original single line cross as we have it now, there would be an additional secondary arrow with a zero line breach of the original MACD setting. Then finally there would be a third arrow when the Master Probability user input number is reached.

Great ideas German having an arrow paint when the zero line of the Mac D crosses would eliminate many false signals. I hope our friend Soundfx can add this to the system. Have a nice weekend.
 
Jeff

This thread is dedicated only to soundfx...
 
Thank You frnd u have been a great help to all of us....

Hi Guys,
 
I think that the latest version of the II_PipAccumulator is ready for you to try.
 
Changes include:
 
Real-time Mode:
To allow arrows to draw only when both MACD and Probability line up
 
All TF Probability:
Displays Probabilities from all timeframes
 
User defined Probability Levels:
So that you're not restricted to using 20/-20 levels
 
E-mail Alerts:
Option to e-mail alerts
 
Here's a small manual on the parameter settings:
 

http://www.multiupload.com/D5F7YFDQ99
 
Here's the main indicator:
 

http://www.multiupload.com/LPZZS9PBLG
 
Note that to handle MTF probabilities, the indicator needs to call the most recent version of II_Prob_Hist which needs to be saved to your indicators directory too:
 

http://www.multiupload.com/UVVKSRMA9O
 
And Here's a screenshot of what the multiple timeframe probabilities looks like:
 
http://i52.tinypic.com/k9yr0g.jpg

There are times when some of you are not at able to be at your computer, and are not able to see certain readings or indicators given off signals and see their behavior.
 
Below is a link to a free and easy to use desktop recording software. It's very easy to use and completely free.
 
I use it to record my desktop when I am testing a system and do not have time to monitor it, I can later review it.
 
I provided the link below for anyone who wishes to download it, also the website explain vey very easy steps on how to use it.
 
http://goview.com/goldwyn/spring/play?method=indexPage

There are times when some of you are not at able to be at your computer, and are not able to see certain readings or indicators given off signals and see their behavior.
 
Below is a link to a free and easy to use desktop recording software. It's very easy to use and completely free.
 
I use it to record my desktop when I am testing a system and do not have time to monitor it, I can later review it.
 
I provided the link below for anyone who wishes to download it, also the website explain vey very easy steps on how to use it.
 
http://goview.com/goldwyn/spring/play?method=indexPage