hyperdimension

Can you show your track record?

Its kinda hard for me to code since im a noob on MQ4 coding, so be gentle, or else ill just delete the whole EA and keep it for myself and not even put it on sale, if this will be the kind of attitude im will get, like Grooters with false accusations....

I don't think you should even be thinking of selling anything anytime soon.

Thanks for sharing.

 

However there is a lot that you still need to learn about backtesting (including the many flaws of MetaTrader and how to get around them).

The statements can be fake. Please provide an Investor login account of this trader that contains at least one withdrawal transaction.

It is interesting how Kangaroo keeps the same stop loss value as it opens new positions. I expected to see each with its own 60 pip SL instead all had the same SL.

Since it's a grid trader, it would see all open trades as a basket with one average entry price and a corresponding basket stop loss price (though a lot of grid traders don't use stop losses - they keep opening new trades hoping for a reversal).

i imagine he's talking about the Kangaroo. Doing tests on my tick data atm. it is reeeeaaallllyyyy slow in testing. judging by the size of the ex4 and dll that's not really surprising.

I wonder if the news filter is the bottleneck. It certainly was in the previous version, which is why I wrote a more efficient version of the filter that uses a 2 dimensional array to store the history.

Has anyone tried to login to the live account? I tried and it would not give me access...

 

Login using these details in any MetaTrader terminal (there's no need to download their terminal if you have the IP address):

 

Login: 1331

Password: LTP082010

Server: 74.119.64.106:443

 

It's still working fine.

Yes MTI might be incorrect if it is using strange lot sizes. When it is shared we can suss it out.

MTI is probably assuming 1 lot = 100K of base currency which causes the equity swings to be 10 times larger. It's not MTI that is "using strange lot sizes", but the trading account, in which 1 lot = 10K of base currency. IBFX has such an account, often called a "mini account".

Bumb this. It's a micro account that they are testing, not publicly available yet. So any calculations($1200 was actually $120) shown here are wrong so far and the account wasn't even close to be blown out.

Maybe the MTI analysis is wrong somewhere, and the MyFxBook page is showing the correct equity history.

 

That chat transcript with Raymond Ong does show that the EA vendor and broker are working and probably profiting together. Whether it's a scam is not yet clear. That MTI analysis chart needs further investigation. I'm not sure how possible it is to allow an account to continue taking trades while equity is negative, as there is a free margin check on the server before any order is accepted and filled.

so deposit is 500, as seen at the start of the graph. yet we end up at minus 1200. how does that happen?

I'm wondering why the MyFXBook page (http://myfxbook.com/members/rayong1/leo-trader-pro/69928) doesn't show such large equity swings.

You should not have taken on any clients if you did not have a long and good track record, as it is a huge responsibility.

 

Now you need to accept responsibility for what you and your business has now become. Sell whatever you have left in order to return your clients' money in full.

No point banning him. This is an open forum, he can just log in using a different username.

Can't you ban his IP address?

You paid for coding yet you don't get the source code? What kind of deal is that?

 

Load the jfx in JForex and then use a debugger to examine the run time memory. It should be in there somewhere.

Dariusz Makowiecki

 

Wayne (Aquarius) = Dariusz = Dominic ....

 

You can see the name Dariusz Makowiecki is listed as one of the real accounts when he advertized for Genius:

http://stashbox.org/1039599/FXGenius_AccountNumbers.gif

 

Here are some screenshots of Dariusz Makowiecki from the www.v-s-p.net web site (a modeling agency in Japan specializing in foreigners) when it still existed last year:

 

http://stashbox.org/1039595/www.v-s-p.net_model.php_id%3D1065_1.gif

http://stashbox.org/1039597/www.v-s-p.net_model.php_id%3D1065_2.gif

http://stashbox.org/1039598/www.v-s-p.net_model.php_id%3D1065_3.gif

 

The actual URL was http://jp.v-s-p.net/model.php?id=1065&p=1&model_type=0&model_nationality=&hair_color=3&eyes_color=3&sort_by=0

 

Here are his bank account details (provided as one of the payment options):

 

Bank: Shinsei Bank

Branch: Shibuya Branch

Address: 150-0043 Tokyo, Shibuya-ku, Dogenzaka 2-29-19, Japan

SWIFT: LTCBJPJT

Account no.: 0340108

Beneficiary: Dariusz Makowiecki

Some vendors use protection in order to hide the fact that they copied the code of another EA with slight modifications, optimized parameters, different symbols and time frame.

I should also add yet another reason why some vendors use protection: to hard code specific dates to skip taking trades. If in previous backtests they found that the EA took a bad trade, they can then enter that date (or a range of days around that date) in the code (either MQL or in the DLL) for that EA to skip. If we can't see the code, we may never know whether any dates were hard coded to skip.

If we ever want to see this type of honost none hype vendors then we should not try to crack their codes in public. I am sure lots of of people who hang out here are reseller pirates

Some vendors use protection in order to hide the fact that they copied the code of another EA with slight modifications, optimized parameters, different symbols and time frame.

this should work sorry for all the foul ups before, I didnt realize that the files had to be shared and available for download.

try this one now.

http://rapidshare.com/files/406405641/full4XGreed_Setup_1.7.zip.html

 

This is a fake version that I believe was released by the vendor. I used a HTTP debugger and found that the setup file tries to access the URL "http://4xgreed.com/installcheck.cfm?Purchaser=Hacked Version That Fuckes UMMM UP". I set the debugger to respond with a HTTP 200 response, and it then passes the internet checks, but after all the files are copied the main EA is missing.

Here is a comparison chart between TickZOOM and other platforms:

http://www.tickzoom.com/raw-attachment/wiki/TickZoom/Comparison/NewComparison.png

http://www.tickzoom.com/raw-attachment/wiki/TickZoom/Comparison/NewComparison.png

Web site: http://www.tickzoom.com

 

This platform looks far better than MetaTrader 4 for accurate and fast backtesting.

 

MetaTrader 4 can only run in a single CPU core and can't backtest over real tick data without a patch and cumbersome tick data preparation.

 

MetaTrader 5 can use multiple CPU cores, however there is currently no way to import custom historical data.

 

Most new computers have multiple CPU cores, and TickZOOM has been designed to make full use of all CPU cores.

 

Here are some quotes from the TickZOOM vendor:

Zoom Speed?

 

Well, TZ processes 11,000,000 ticks in just under 40 seconds

and never uses over 80 meg of memory. Is that ZOOM speed? You decide.

 

It can also process billions of ticks which takes linearly longer,

but due to streaming technology someone recommended (and was added)

it never uses more than around 80 meg of memory and so it can

actually run endless amounts of data without blowing the PC memory.

 

Someone also pushed for addding the ability to process bar data at

equivalent speeds and that was added recently, it processes over

6,000 bars (25 years of daily data) in less than 400 ms. That can

make for some really quickly optimizations runs.

 

TickZOOM can also backtest multiple strategies over multiple symbols, i.e. "portfolio" backtesting.

MetaTrader 4 can only backtest over one symbol at a time.

 

A free trial is available if you email the vendor. Does anyone have it already and can share it?

I will make a tick counter indicator

You shouldn't need to because Volume (in MetaTrader) is the count of ticks within a bar. So you can just display the standard Volume indicator.

So maybe this is due to the single thread design of MT4 and not to a problem in Indo Run.

That is correct. You need to use IsTradeContextBusy before submitting any order to the server:

http://docs.mql4.com/check/IsTradeContextBusy

It could be a grid trader. You can see multiple trades closing at the same time in the history. Check the maximum trade duration and maximum total open volume.

 

The open trades are private because he may not want you to see how many trades it can have open at one time.

 

The risk with grid trading strategies is having too much volume open and/or having trades open for too long, which can lead to account stop out ("margin call").

Just use FXDD's data (http://global.fxdd.com/en/mt1m-data.html). Use the Import function in History Center. Then use the period converter script to convert the data for each time frame.

And from http://www.forex-directory.org/details/96/dukascopy.html about Dukascopy stated very very clearly for you all traders to see yourself before decide to invest in LHC/Dukascopy:

 

History of Dukascopy 1998 Dukascopy Trading Technologies Corp.

Dukascopy project was launched in 1998 by a group of physicists affiliated with CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research). Its mission was to research, develop and implement financial complex system via novel mathematical and econophysical techniques

 

(econophysical ??? see the relation between economics and physics hope not reaching economics balance on earth through genocides by physical doom machine/mini black hole).

That sounds like their goal is to profit from high frequency trading. They would certainly have the infrastructure and low latency connections to multiple liquidity providers to do so.

 

Econophysics usually refers to the application of physics theory to financial market data, e.g. brownian motion.

If you see "Using M1" after starting the backtest, then it is not reading your FXT file and instead is creating a new one using the M1 HST data.

 

If you give up, FXDD data (http://global.fxdd.com/en/mt1m-data.html) is an Ok compromise as long as the EA being tested is not very spread-sensitive.