Jump to content

crodzilla

Members
  • Posts

    147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by crodzilla

  1. the indicator requires you enter your username and password which is passed to the server for authentication.

    the indicator data is pushed to the indicator for display.

    So, essentially there is no crack... its an open mq4 free to be modified to your individual needs.

     

    Carl

     

    P.S. I don't like the way the indicator displays. I rather use the website display.

  2. Looking at a gold daily chart... it has a hard time with trends. When price reaches into an overbought or oversold condition, the indicator tries to pick the tops and bottoms. For Gold, the signals are horrible (daily & weekly), even confirming on the weekly chart.

     

    The trick may be to skip the first signal on a lower timeframe and take the second. Thereby confirming that price is indeed turning around. Needs more testing though.

  3. Interesting indicator. Traded 4 trades (1-min timeframe to test repaint) confirmed with the 15-min direction. All winners. Even better, the signals are on the open of a bar (outstanding indicator design).

     

    Looking back at the past, sometimes the longer timeframe precedes signals from a shorter term timeframe. Which is opposite of what usually happens, on lagging indicators.

     

    Very interesting.

  4. fxeasy5, yep... I've seen so many of these. And I have coded dozens of them. I have coded strategies for people who swear they have the "holy grail." Then when their EA fails to produce, they change the strategy... etc, etc... There is no convincing some people that there is no "holy grail." And another thing people just don't understand... if there is such a thing as a "holy grail..." it wouldn't be posted on this board. Sorry, won't happen.

     

    Carl

  5. It is probably the same. The code allows for more than higher-high/lower-low of the 4 bars plus the LEN value. So, the bigger LEN is, the more bars (longer trend) there would have to be before a signal is generated. At least, that is what I believe. I will have to code something in MT4 to prove it.

     

    Carl

  6. Hi crodzilla,

     

    Because you failed before is not enough reason to remain Negative.

     

    Just code the Enhanced Logic I posted and lets test it

     

    Elvis

     

    I am not saying you are... but your previous post sounds like you are ordering me to code this for you...

    Just saying, be careful how you word things on these boards. Mis-communication can happen very easily.

     

    If anybody has this supply/demand indicator, please email to me or post it.

     

    Carl

  7. A rough translation... I'm not a tradestation programmer, but it seems that if the close is higher than 4 bars ago (1 iteration), and current close is less than current open, and the current high is greater than the highs (len) bars ago, then there is a high exhaustion signal.

     

    Opposite for the low exhaustion signal.

     

    Carl

  8. I do not think I am negative... just a realist.

    I am a programmer, which means I use logical thinking to solve problems.

    I tried your initial logic as posted in the first post. It didn't work so well. Not negative, just fact.

     

    Now, there is "Enhanced" logic, which by your account should be used.

    And you mention something about a Sam Seiden supply/demand indicator.

    So, I'm logically thinking to myself... if you had used this indicator to trade this method, you could post it. And I could use it to add to the EA.

     

    But, me not being negative, I wonder if you have traded this "methodology."

    Or, are you getting this information 2nd or 3rd hand.

    Or, you don't need the indicator because you can use your brain to see the supply/demand areas... which is cool too. Just hard to program.

     

    Carl

     

    PS. And as far as you saying "you failed." From what I can tell... you "failed" to give all the information required for this method... initially.

  9. Hi crodzilla,

     

    We are all here to learn and discover, so believing that something will fail before you even try it or test it is a Negative attitude especially when it is free and risk free via demo trading. Let's build it first then we can talk based on clear facts and not opinions.

     

    Elvis

     

    Uhh... I thought I was clear about this... I wrote an EA to test it. It fails every time. I tested dozens of different times to start the EA and they ALL fail with a wipeout of the account.

     

    I have written 100's of EA's from people not only on this forum, but other very large forums. I am very well known at FF (you can look me up... same user name.) I have taken on lots of private work (many I am paid) to write EA's from people that say they have the golden egg... Their supposed "holy grail" of trading methods are ALWAYS proven to be less than fruitful.

     

    Please... I talk the talk, and have walked the walk.

     

    Carl

×
×
  • Create New...