Jump to content

pultimo

Members
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pultimo

  1. Re: Sincere apology

     

    Maybe the threat isn't so effective as it appears at a first glance. With few opportune changes you can sterilize pratically any effective threat.

    First, as suggested, use some anonymizer proxi, better if located in certain countries... Web surfing will slow a bit but this site is pratically a "only text" site, maybe you'll even note no differences.

    Or, if you want to be totally anonymous, use Thor.

     

    More important, don't ever use locutions like: "I have done this for you". Use phrases like this,instead: "I have found somewhere this file that seems to be what you are looking for, try yourself 'cause I have not time to download and try it...."

    With these simple changes you have dramatically reduced chances for an effective action against you: a legal action absolutely needs a guilty identified without any error or it will becomes a money-nightmare for the attacker...

    Forex EA market is not as fat as music market, it doesn't move millions of $$$ for a single EA, most of that eas are pure scam and A LOT of them are simply copied, with a gigantic copyright violation. There is no need to turn on the lights on such a market...

  2. Re: EAs tested

     

    My requirement for a good EA, relative and max draw down shall less than 18%, open floating position shall be less than 18% equity drawdown, and profits factor > 1.5.

    Ehy..!! You are lookin' for my EA !!

    :-)

     

    I have tried and coded several eas like this but there is always a price to pay: small losses, small risk--->small gains (if all goes right....) you can't circumvent this.

    And..sure, if you'll find an EA with such characteristics and big gains, I'm really true interested.. :-)

    :peace:

  3. Re: i have never seen anything indicators by pollon from russia

     

    Assuming that the formula is correct, my personal interpretation of it is as follow:

    1) min and max can't be the same, so we have to figure out some discriminating method. I guess that you have to collect 2 different sums for min and max,i.e.: for the min you have to sum the first 3 (or 4 or 5 ecc..) terms and all the series for the max.

    For example, in my brute elaboration I have fixed the chain of sums to 15 terms; the sum of the first 7 term gives us the min value, the sum of all 15 term give us the max value. The sum of both min and max gives the value of the indicator. 7 and 15 are arbitrary values.

    Furthemore, the value of CCI and RSI is arbitrary too: I have choosen the standard '14'.

    Final result shows flebile evidences in favour of this indicator as a trigger for a buy signal BUT you have always to consider that this indicator looks into the future: backtesting shows this disappointing effect with wrong signals. Becarful.

    Moreover, the scales of CCI and RSI are really different in size, as pointed out by William, and the final sum of min and max looks slighty different from the sum of all terms only.

    In the end, we do not have enough information to put a final word about this indicator but - if the things are as we know it - it don't seems a real 'killer'.

    :peace:

     

     

    p.s.: sorry, I can't attach the image of indicator 'cause: "the board attachment quota has been reached." I don't know how to solve the problem

  4. Re: i have never seen anything indicators by pollon from russia

     

    There is a new update.

     

    a1=(cci-rsi)

     

    a2=(cci[i-1]-rsi[i+1])-(cci-rsi)

     

    a3=(cci[i-2]-rsi[i+2])-(cci[i-1]-rsi[i+1])

     

    ....

     

    an=(cci[i-n]-rsi[i+n])-(cci[i-(n-1)]-rsi[i+(n-1)]) // I think this is general equation.

     

    tt1=max(a1+...+an)

     

    tt2=min(a1+...+an)

     

    res=tt1+tt1

     

    Really strange formula: despite any other consideration ttmax e ttmin are the same, res is the sum of the same result...something wrong again?

  5. Re: enybody programer to make simple code to MQL4 ?

     

    I wont when EA open new SELL position , BUY lots = SELL lots , so new position will be SELL 3 lots.

    I mean , every time when EA open new position ,to see how many BUY and SELL open lots we have , and make ever SELL lots=BUY lots , or BUY lots=SELL lots.

    It looks a bit obscure...what do you want exactly: do you want to buy/sell the same number of lots used in the last orders? If so, it's quite easy, otherwise, simply I don't understand what you want...

    :peace:

×
×
  • Create New...