hermanhess Posted May 19, 2020 Report Posted May 19, 2020 Here's a MACD system I found that apparently has positive expectancy, over a 100 trades the stats are 62% wins with a 1.5:1 reward to risk ratio (no commission & slippage) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmffSjdZbWQ Is a sample size of a 100 trades enough to draw a realistic conclusion if the strategy has positive expectancy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7C2mKg8W60 ⭐ Gambler67, speedyt, fireflyk and 2 others 5 Quote
⭐ aotegaoteg Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 the only winning strategy is price and correlation, MACD is not a leading indicator has he has stated at 6.30min Trading is a probabilities game try to automate as much as possible, that is a lot of manual task to perform for backtesting. keep up the good work Quote
EL_Trader Posted February 4, 2021 Report Posted February 4, 2021 No indicator is a leading indicator. If you have an indicator that will know what price will be before it happens then you wouldn't be on this site. Quote
ootl10 Posted February 6, 2021 Report Posted February 6, 2021 automate is possible but you make more discretionary Quote
⭐ fxwin Posted February 25, 2021 Report Posted February 25, 2021 These are the long term results and the code for Tradestation: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.