[SHARE]MoneyM@ker

[csa1234]

Two trades today: +11 pips. and +32 pips Edited March 11, 2011 by csa1234

[csa1234]

Tip to make it work: Do not use money mangement of the ea, use fixed lots and it will open the positions.

[Guest maskumareshraja]

  csa1234 said:

Tip to make it work: Do not use money mangement of the ea, use fixed lots and it will open the positions.

 

What are the setings u used?

[proprietario]

sorry, buy the EA works alone in demo account? I work with other EA, maybe is this the problem?

 

Can you write wich version is? And the setting..thank's.

[numeric]

Any one test the moneymaker5m 2.6e in demo with backtest. pl any one have this working bt ea, give the post...................!

[Guest maskumareshraja]

MM 2.6e is not worked in backtest. New version MM 2.7a is available. Somebody have

share that EA.

[proprietario]

  csa1234 said:

Two trades today: +11 pips. and +32 pips

 

but since the time you're testing? I made ​​a

backtest and saw that the results are impressive.

 

We show that in live demo is also

impressive?

[anonymousdave]

Backtest 2.6e working.

 

I found the places in the code that prevented it from working and made the changes.

 

Get the new file here: http://uploading.com/files/616ce6af/Moneymaker5M%2B2.6e.mq4/

[taipan]

if some member who is interested in doing backtest with tickdata of 99% modeling quality, try to download from other forum:

 

url: hxxp://www.trader-f0rex.fr/forum/systemes-de-trading-auto/16519-99-modeling-quality-when-backtesting-mt4-build-225-a.html

 

All the instructions are given in the forum.

 

  Quote

As the title says, I prepared a set of tools that enable testing with 99% modeling quality. I also downloaded and processed the tick data from Dukascopy, but uploading the CSV files is quite a pain in the a** so, for now, I'm only uploading the EURUSD tick package (it's about 400 MB compressed, ~4.5GB uncompressed). I'll upload other currency pairs if there's enough interest.

 

Thanks are appreciated.

[⭐ musketeer]

it is copied from the original:

http://eareview.net/tick-data#prepareddata

[pavlus777]

  anonymousdave said:

Backtest 2.6e working.

 

I found the places in the code that prevented it from working and made the changes.

 

Get the new file here: http://uploading.com/files/616ce6af/Moneymaker5M%2B2.6e.mq4/

Backtersting this one I'm only getting sraight down line ((

[acosma]

  pavlus777 said:

Backtersting this one I'm only getting sraight down line ((

 

pavlus777, me too.

[numeric]

  acosma said:

pavlus777, me too.

 

We don't undustand your words pl expline it.

[pavlus777]

  numeric said:

We don't undustand your words pl expline it.

I'm getting very bad backtests with version posted by anonymousdave.

[⭐ musketeer]

  anonymousdave said:

Backtest 2.6e working.

 

I found the places in the code that prevented it from working and made the changes.

 

Get the new file here: http://uploading.com/files/616ce6af/Moneymaker5M%2B2.6e.mq4/

 

can somebody mirros at different service? that does not works for me

[pavlus777]

  musketeer said:

can somebody mirros at different service? that does not works for me

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9683904/Moneymaker5M_2.6e.mq4

[csa1234]

2.6 is not good... we need to obtain latest version 2.7, in the meanwhile ill keep 2.0 and when i make a good profit consistenly ill buy 2.7

[numeric]

2.6 is very bad in Backtest. we need mm5m 2.0 with winning settings or 2.7 version.In 2.0 some it work , what the reason why it not working some days?

 

anybody modify the code and post the code.

[numeric]

Pl consentrate Version 2.0 Backtest is very good. there are some changes in real a/c.

 

Any programmer to change some rectification on 2.0 v. Do it.---------------!.

[anonymousdave]

  pavlus777 said:

I'm getting very bad backtests with version posted by anonymousdave.

 

I got horrible backtests too, however I have not taken the time to even begin to understand all of the settings. Would really need a manual for guidance.

[askalas]

I did a little special test on this one to try and figure out how curve-fitted it is. There are two backtests, one normal using dukascopy tickdata and one where I've mirrored the ticks so that it moves in opposite direction but still is likely marketdata. My hypothesis is that a "normal" curve-fitted strategy would fail this test. It didn't...

 

http://www.4shared.com/file/TgEP0Ji1/MoneyMaker_EURUSD_5Min_TestRep.html

 

 

Compare price at first trade with the last on each report and you'll see that they are not the same.

 

Update: I've updated the report zip-file with an additional report. I realized that just mirroring tickdata is not enough to test for curvefitting. So, I added noise and the results look completely different... The noise consists of ~5% of the tick data not being mirrored., i.e., same distance of movement but sometimes not same direction.

Edited March 14, 2011 by askalas
Updated report-files

[Ferenc86]

I use Moneymaker5M_2.0m_Demo (first post), very good backtest, but I can not see all orders in my live account. Example: IF on backtest are was 30 trades, in live account about 15-20.. And I believe it because I can not see the SLIPPAGE parameter/setting. Or I am not right? The slippage is very very important. Anybody can fix this problem in metaeditor? Slippage and max spread filter would be needed very much. Thanks!

[metalriff]

money maker is massively curve fitted, Ive been testing this from the creator, all the versions and updated , over a year now, move on. Only profitable in BT over long term

[metalriff]

Sorry man.

[numeric]

  metalriff said:

money maker is massively curve fitted, Ive been testing this from the creator, all the versions and updated , over a year now, move on. Only profitable in BT over long term

 

Already you have test it. You should openy write the merits Man.....:))