Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I got this from my friend and would like to share with you.

I dont know if it is real or not.

maybe programmers can take look at it.

 

grab it here:

http://sharebee.com/dc8f4e96

 

if you found this is useful, please give me kudo.

 

thanks a lot. :-bd

Posted

Re: [share] EA Better 2007 champ

 

Thanks for share.

 

I have tried to understand betters method for quite a long time. I can say: This is not betters PNN EA.

 

This only has the code

  double Direction(int ai_0, double ad_4, int ai_12, double ad_16) {
  double ld_ret_24 = 0;
  double l_iac_32 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 0);
  double l_iac_40 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 7);
  double l_iac_48 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 14);
  double l_iac_56 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 21);
  ld_ret_24 = ai_0 * l_iac_32 + 100.0 * (ad_4 - 1.0) * l_iac_40 + (ai_12 - 100) * l_iac_48 + 100.0 * ad_16 * l_iac_56;
  return (ld_ret_24);
}

it then use the normal 1 layer 4 variables to curve fits for the last week, and run on the next week.

 

Definitive it is not the Better method. However, this does not means it is not ok. try to train it with last 4 weeks data with optimization of these 4 parameter, and run on the next week.

 

The last 4 weeks, could be 2008 week 20 to week 24, then you run it on the 2008 week 25.

Posted

Re: [share] EA Better 2007 champ

 

Hi

 

Thanks for sharing. But how can I use this EA? Timeframe, pairs?

 

Thanks for explication.

 

Cheers,

 

megainvest

 

TimeFrame shall be H1, pairs is EURUSD. read my last email for training on data.

Posted

Re: [share] EA Better 2007 champ

 

Hi finimej,

 

I know this is not Better EA, TF for Better is M1 or M5, as you said you are trying to understand the Better method, do you have the real Better?

If so, please share

Thanks

Posted

Re: [share] EA Cloned Better 2007 champ

 

one the 2009-01-31 communication.

Thanks finimej,

 

I know that some dishonest people are trying to sell allegedly my EA :) I have already answered (in Russian) on the page http://championship.mql4.com/2007/ru/users/edit/Better that this EA is not mine.

Actually, this (allegedly my) EA is a variant of Yury Reshetov's EA.

There is a discussion on mql4 site about it:

http://forum.mql4.com/ru/18643

You can freely download this EA from here:

http://forum.mql4.com/c/forum/2009/01/EA_Betterf.mq4

(notice, finimej comments here: this is not Better EA neither!).

Regards,

Alex

 

On 26/01/2009, finimej wrote:

> Hi Olexandr Topchylo,

>

> ?????? ???????? is selling an so called better EA and refere to you,

> on his web http://ea-shop.net/index.php?productID=115

> You may declare on your championship page that this is not your EA at all.

>

> Yours

> (finimej)

Posted

Re: [share] EA Better 2007 champ

 

  double Direction(int ai_0, double ad_4, int ai_12, double ad_16) {
  double ld_ret_24 = 0;
  double l_iac_32 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 0);
  double l_iac_40 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 7);
  double l_iac_48 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 14);
  double l_iac_56 = iAC(Symbol(), 0, 21);
  ld_ret_24 = ai_0 * l_iac_32 + 100.0 * (ad_4 - 1.0) * l_iac_40 + (ai_12 - 100) * l_iac_48 + 100.0 * ad_16 * l_iac_56;
  return (ld_ret_24);
}

 

Yes, this is the whole trading system. This EA takes a buy/sell choice, based on the returned value of this function. If Direction()>0 ->BUY if Direction()<0 ->SELL.

However i'd like to know where this guy come up with this formula?

 

ld_ret_24 = ai_0 * l_iac_32 + 100.0 * (ad_4 - 1.0) * l_iac_40 + (ai_12 - 100) * l_iac_48 + 100.0 * ad_16 * l_iac_56;

 

To make it simple:

(1)= Warp*A where -100<Warp<100

(2)=100*(Deviation-1.0)*B where 0<Deviation<2.0

(3)=(Amplitude-100)*C where 0<Amplitude<200

(4)=100*Distortion*D where -1.0<Distortion<1.0

 

then,

ReturnValue=(1)+(2)+(3)+(4)

This is some sort of formula which resembles to me like a twisted type of wave/vector equation. What do you think finimej?

And another fair question would be: why this guy choose in a arbitrary manner the Bar to be analyzed 0,7,14,21 which result to be seven multipliers...

:-/

Posted

Re: [share] EA Cloned Better 2007 champ

 

it just one single layer with 4 varible, pure backward curve fits to get the 4 variable and run on the data in the future.

prodicability is 50%, no so greate.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...