Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trade Like a Dealer

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trade Like a Dealer

    Trade Like a Dealer
    (And Avoid Death by a Thousand Stops)
    by: Boris Schlossberg

    Instead of hating dealers, traders should learn to trade like them. The insights are worth the trouble.

    A trader stares intently at the five-minute chart and sees that prices are plummeting through the 20 period moving

    average. Instantly he sells several lots, anticipating a sharp move down. But suddenly, price action pauses, stabilizes

    and then quickly turns around, running back up beyond his entry point. He gets stopped out for a loss. Unfazed, he

    focuses on his screen once more and now sees that price has pierced the 20 EMA to the upside. His momentum

    indicators have turned bullish, and now he buys. At first, price follows his direction, turning his floating profit-and-loss

    statement green – but well short of his target price. The price hesitates again, halts for one more bar and then plunges

    below his entry and right into his second stop loss of the day. Dazed, he watches silently as it rallies once more and

    now takes out the daily high without him.

    What is this, you wonder. Day trading by Inspector Clousseau?
    Hardly. This trader displayed enormous discipline and control. He adhered to his plan. He used proper money

    management techniques, and he even followed classic risk/reward ratios. In short, he did everything by the book. Yet

    most likely he will wind up just another victim of the market – destroyed not by the typical impulsive burn-out trades of

    most amateurs, but by the death of a thousand little stop-loss cuts.

    Why do most traders lose money even when they follow all the proper rules? – Because markets rarely offer a smooth

    trend. Instead, they usually thrust and retrace frequently, spooking traders out of what eventually turn out to be profitable

    positions. As a result, traders are beaten by maddening runs of constant stop outs. According to famous trading coach

    David Landry, a series of small stops often can add up to be bigger a loss than a large stop.

    Why does this happen? Markets are a zero-sum game. For every winner, there must be a loser. Winners’ profits come

    from the losers. The sooner retail traders understand that reality, the better are their chances of becoming profitable

    traders.

    And on the opposite side of most of retail transactions are professional traders known as dealers. One of the main

    reasons prices tend to back and fill in almost all financial instruments is because when customers are buying, dealers

    are selling and vice versa. Dealers make their profits from the small retraces in price by quickly unloading their newly

    acquired inventory. If that sounds like more like a scene from a chaotic Middle Eastern bazaar than some highly

    sophisticated, finely engineered process – it is. That’s why those with instincts of a pushcart vendor often become

    much better traders than Ivy League graduates with degrees in quantitative finance.

    Don’t Hate the Dealer
    Whether trading stocks, options, futures or forex, I’ve never heard a kind word from retail traders about dealers. They

    cheat, they steal, and they make markets wide enough to drive a Mack truck through. They back away from their quotes

    when markets get wild. And on and on and on. All true, but immaterial.

    In recent years, two factors have made markets fairer and more efficient for retail traders – competition and

    computerization. Presently, all major financial markets are fully electronic with strict price and time-stamp rules that

    provide traders with auditable results and lightning-fast execution. Often traders have the opportunity to join the dealers

    in buying on the bid and selling on the ask, thus completely leveling the playing field. In short, why be mad at the dealers

    for your own bad decisions? Dealers, after all, offer a necessary market service – liquidity. Don’t think so? Just try to get

    rid of a 100,000-share position after market hours if some adverse news hits the stock. Volatility takes on a whole new

    meaning when 33 percent of your position value disappears in less than a minute on what often is only a mildly bad

    piece of news.

    Instead of hating dealers, traders should learn to trade like them. Unlike regular retail traders, dealers usually follow two

    maxims: Always be fading, and never trust the first price. The fact that dealers usually are on the opposite side of price

    action really should come as no surprise when one realizes that 80 percent of the time markets are range-bound – and,

    therefore, retrace the original move. During the 20 percent of the time when markets do trend, dealers often sustain

    losses. Tom Baldwin was a former meatpacker who started with a $25,000 grubstake and became one of the largest

    market makers in the Chicago

    Board of Trade’s Treasury bond pit, often turning over $1 billion of inventory per day. In an interview with Jack Schwager

    he said the following, “Because I’m a market maker, I take the other side of the trend. So if the market goes one way for

    50 ticks, I can guarantee you I’m going the wrong way, and at some point it is going to be a loss.”

    Typically when dealers incur trend risk, they chalk it up to cost of doing business. However, on some occasions the

    one-way moves are so severe and so relentless that dealers can go bankrupt. Witness the example of several NYSE

    specialist firms that continued to make markets during the 1987 stock market crash and sustained unrecoverable

    losses.

    Scaling in – Not Averaging Down
    Although fading the trend may not be the rule most retail traders wish to follow, it is the dealers’ second trick that can be

    of tremendous help to retail speculators. In his very informative book, The Market Makers Edge, Josh Lukeman writes,

    “Successful market makers have controlled the ego-based need to be absolutely correct. Because markets are

    constantly in motion, it is almost impossible to be exactly right on (in your entries).” Such a probative approach to the

    markets is at the heart of most successful professional trading. Dealers know full well that their first foray into the trade

    is often wrong. They rarely commit the full position amount on the first try.

    One of the key differences between professionals and amateurs is that professionals scale into trades while amateurs

    average down. This statement may seem like clever wordplay, but it’s not. Let’s assume that both the professional and

    the amateur decide to risk two percent of their capital account on a particular trade. The professional knows full well that

    he will not be able to hit the exact entry point on his first attempt. Therefore, he may allocate only 0.3% of his capital to

    the first entry, 0.6% on the second and 1.2% to the third – and stop himself out at -2.7% away from original entry price

    (-2% risk).

    On the other hand, the amateur will plow in with a full two-percent position, and then when the trade goes against him,

    he may decide to “double down again” and then average in yet a third time. At this point, the amateur has committed six

    percent of his capital to the trade, and if the trade continues to move against him, he will throw in his towel with a

    massive -12% loss (sum of -6%,-4% and -2% losses). Five disasters like that and the amateur loses 60 percent of his

    account. In a zero-sum game, he has just moved much closer to zero.

    Over-Leverage and Diversification
    This example serves to illustrate one of the greatest pieces of trading advice ever given. When asked by Jack Schwager

    what is the one act most traders must do to become successful, Bruce Kovner – perhaps the greatest hedge fund

    manager ever and a man who has beaten the markets for more than 30 years and to whom other hedge fund managers

    entrust their savings – simply said,” Undertrade, undertrade, undertrade.” Prodded further by Schwager, he explained,

    “Whatever you think your position ought to be, cut it at least in half. My experience with novice traders is that they trade

    three to five times too big. They are taking five- to ten-percent risks on a trade when they should be risking one- to

    two-percent.”

    Unfortunately, this is the advice most retail traders roundly ignore. It’s not exciting to trade for pennies and nickels – far

    more glamorous to try to make $1,000 a day. Yet that is the likeliest path to ruin. After having watched thousands of

    accounts trade, I can unequivocally say that the biggest reason for the failure of most retail traders is not lack of

    knowledge, nor is it the inability to understand the nuances of the market or poor technical analysis skills. The number

    one reason is over-leverage.

    Imagine you are driving down a typical suburban street in your subdivision at the normal 25 mph. Now imagine that the

    speed of the car suddenly accelerates to 250 mph. What are the chances that you will make it to the end of the block

    unharmed, especially if your neighbor is driving towards you from the other
    direction? That’s leverage. Professionals fully recognize its power and do not risk more than they control – and then they

    diversify their risk by not betting everything on one single price.

    As investors, we are always taught that diversification is crucial to success in the market. Yet when it comes to trading,

    most speculators practice the “all-in approach.” Harry Markowitz, who in the 1950s was the first man to apply

    systematical statistical analysis to the market, demonstrated mathematically how the average of highly risky securities

    actually generates a smaller standard deviation (and therefore, smaller risk) than a uniform portfolio of presumably safe

    stocks. The math behind his discovery is beyond the scope of this article, but suffice it to say that this seeming enigma

    applies to diversification of price action as well. Getting a blended price often is less risky than plowing all at once into

    the trade.

    Applying Dealing Methods to Trend
    While scaling may be appealing to many retail traders, trading against the trend probably will not appeal to most. So

    here is an example, and please note that it is only a suggestion and by no means a trading setup. Every trader must

    discover his own edge in the market – there is no such thing as easy money.

    Let’s examine one common strategy many retail traders like to follow – the break-out trade. Using dealing methodology,

    here is an approach to possibly make the trade less risky. As shown in Figure 1, the trader can scale into the trade three

    times. By diversifying his position, he does not even need to have price exceed his initial entry point to record a profitable

    trade! If, however, he is correct in anticipating the direction, he still can capture the move with a partial entry.

    Consequently, by modifying the risk, the retail speculator can improve his approach and truly begin trading like a dealer.


    Regards

  • #2
    Re: Trade Like a Dealer

    The problem is, not every small trader like us are able to scale in. Only some brokers allow scaling in and all allow averaging. Thus the "scaling in but not averaging" advice is somewhat "useless" imho.

    Regards,

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Trade Like a Dealer

      Very interesting article. Scaling in however, can be viewed as similar to a Martingale strategy, but can be effective using extremely low leverage as the article points out.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Trade Like a Dealer

        scaling in can be very good, just keep risk down

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Trade Like a Dealer

          Thanks for that. Could you post the picture mentioned in the article too please regarding the breakout strategy?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Trade Like a Dealer

            the save is follow the trend and dont be greedy

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Trade Like a Dealer

              interesting reading, but money for scaling in needs to be available.
              Thx for posting.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Trade Like a Dealer

                I've been sitting in front for my Forex monitor all day, trying very (VERY!) much different strategies. Some worked, osme didn't. Overall win was about 20% in 4 years. Compared to the time and nerves consumed this is a horrible return.

                I got FAPTurbo, Forex Shocker, and XTREME EURCHF v2 now, and this has tripled my account since April. And what I did to make it work ? Install, apply an USV to my computer, tweaked the settings a bit to higher risk and let it run ... no efforts made further.

                THIS is what I call earning money while sleeping...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Trade Like a Dealer

                  its very interesting, even though i think some things he says are no-nos. lol

                  Comment

                  Top Active Users

                  Collapse

                  There are no top active users.
                  Working...
                  X