Jump to content

alankw88

Members
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by alankw88

  1. by claiming to be able to get MT4 price data feed 20 seconds ahead all brokers and liquidity providers

     

    AND

     

    by denying the fact that his system is a martingale and calling it "very safe" then admiting later after words that it is a martingale.

     

    Aroman is yet another low life scammer, except that he is a lot more ****** than FXIgor

     

    Pity you are not in the project home and you will never get the picture of the project. For those already in the project, we all knows what Aroman doing and achieving. This will be my last post in this thread..Bye!

    *PS: You should return the place where you come from...

  2. We decided to commerliaze our EA. So I can no longer use this forum or topic to talk about my EA because that would be spamming.

     

    I asked one of the administrators to deleet the topic but he refused because he was worried that he would get the blame for it.

     

    The main reason that we go commercial is that we (my programmer and me) don't want to help people who would never bother to thank us or after downloading the EA would still prefer to kick me in the balls.

    People who want to thank us or want to show some gratitude will pay for it. People who don't want to show some gratitude will not pay for it and this way we do not need to feel frustrated that we helped distructive fools. Or that we need to feel like fools.

    The majority of the people here are only out to get something (can you please share can you please share....)... and don't show any respect or gratitude.

     

    My true appolagys to the people who did support us.

     

    Friendly regards... iGoR

     

    PS. To the administrators if you deleet this topic please take away also the kudos that I received. I don't want to be thanked for nothing.

     

    What a big joke I read today. Thanks for your hardwork and effort, Joker! By the way, Aroman is more reliable and responsible than you! Please, you shouldn't compare with Aroman! Shame on you, iGoR!

  3. I'm sorry for asking..but why would you want to do that?

    The ea was designed to trade all those pairs. Just attached it to usdjpy and it will trade on all the other 6 pairs too.

    Don't be greedy though. I started with 0.01 lot size and now I'm using 0.02 as my account already doubled :D

     

    This is the best ea that I'm running after 2 years searching :D:D:D

     

    Hi forexfx,

     

    May I know what is your Take_Profit setting? Thanks.

  4. As I mentioned before, M2 is not a 2 minute chart (so period converter is not used). It is just a placeholder for a rangebar chart. If using the EA, load the EA on a 1min chart and specify 2 in the settings. Then open a offline chart using M2 and apply the template.

     

    By the way, I did try using the rangebar indicator shared previously but it yielded different results so I am sticking with the EA.

     

    Hi Diesel,

     

    Could you please give more details about what are the difference? The arrow painted on different bar?

     

    Thanks.

  5. Do you let the BT complete? Mine runs for a long time even on my **** data before ever taking a trade.

     

    EDIT: Just ran the same BT on sig's 4 digit and 5 digit feed and got no errors and a few trades.

    I don't have the time to test out the dukas data on this. I'm not one that is big on BT. I am more about fwd test on demo or live cent account.

     

    EDIT2: Looking through the code and not seeing many division with variables in there. One place has to do with accounts that are not USD accounts. By any chance does your account fall under this category?

    double GetAccCurrToUSD() {
      double l_bid_0;
      if (gs_180 == "USD") return (1);
      if (gs_180 == "EUR") return (MarketInfo("EURUSD", MODE_BID));
      if (gs_180 == "RUR") {
         l_bid_0 = MarketInfo("USDRUR", MODE_BID);
         if (l_bid_0 == 0.0) return (1 / gd_152);
         return (1 / l_bid_0);

     

    Here is another area that could cause this error

     

    double Get_RAVI(int a_timeframe_0, int a_period_4, int a_period_8, int a_ma_method_12, int a_applied_price_16, int ai_20) {
      double l_ima_24 = iMA(NULL, a_timeframe_0, a_period_4, 0, a_ma_method_12, a_applied_price_16, ai_20);
      double l_ima_32 = iMA(NULL, a_timeframe_0, a_period_8, 0, a_ma_method_12, a_applied_price_16, ai_20);
      double ld_ret_40 = 100.0 * ((l_ima_24 - l_ima_32) / l_ima_32);
      return (ld_ret_40);

     

    If the iMA returns a 0 then l_ima_32=0 and ld_ret_40 will create a zero divide error. Like I mentioned before, this would be caused by lack of data to calculate the iMA.

     

    Perhaps your dukas data was only created for 1 TF and this is using a diff TF to calculate the iMA. This would cause your error. To test, create the tick data for EVERY tf for EU and not just the M15. Then run the BT on M15 and see if you still get the error.

     

    I see...Yup, the tick data is only on M15. I will try the method you suggested. Thanks so much for your advice and time.

  6. Alankw88--

     

    Are you saying that when you run a backtest that you ONLY get zero divide errors throughout the entire BT and never get any trades?

     

    BTW... here is a free tool to test the integrity of your data...

     

    http://www.mt4i.com/dataintegrity.aspx

     

    Also, tick data from dukas is NOT in mt4 format. You must convert it and that could be where you are introducing problems.

     

    ALSO, also, I have seen on numerous times that a perfecting working EA gives zero divide error during the beginning of BT. But after it starts moving fwd in the data it starts taking trades. Some see the zero divide and stop the tests prematurely.

     

    Hi Jayman,

     

    I followed the steps here from Birt

    http://eareview.net/tick-data

     

    I backtested on others EA, no problem. But, I get zero divide error when testing on Baila.

  7. Is someone willing to share a 99% backtest for this EA ?

    I tried to backtest using Dukascopy data with no success

     

    Same here too. When I backtest others EA on the same data from Dukascopy. No problem at all.

    But, I get "zero divide" error when testing Baila robot. It never opened a single trade and the whole journal is full of zero divide error :(

  8. Listen guys.. zero divide is NOT a show stopper.

     

    This just means that you don't have good data. If you have a mathematical equation that involves division (like a ratio) and the denominator (the number on the bottom) is Zero then you have a situation that breaks algebraic math. Try to take any number and divide it by 0 on ANY calculator and you will see what I mean. This is one function that breaks algebra. This is also why Calculus was born (but that is another story).

     

    So back to zero divide error...... this just means that the denominator is 0 (without value) probably due to lack of good data. Either download better history or just let it keep running and once it has full data to make it's calculations it will. This has NOTHING to do with 4 or 5 dig brokers.

     

    I've tick data from Dukascopy. So, the history data shouldn't be the problem. I believe the problem is come from calculation in the EA.

  9. As far as I know the SL is not fixed but dependant on where the control line is plus 20 pips. So if the control candle was only 5 pips the SL would be 25 pips. Your reasoning re the RR is reversed. The worse the RR is the more likely a big run of consec winners. If you had a 2 pip TP and a 200pip SL---a terrible RR-- you would likely have a lot of winers in a row.

    Freddie--- the HE is Dreamliner

     

    If there is a few losing trade in a row, it will wipe out all the profit. Not a good strategy for a long run..

  10. Hi All,

     

    After forward testing the method for a week on shorter time frames, I would say this system is a trend following system. If you follows the rules, you will get high probability trades to profit. But, if the trend is going to turn into opposite direction, then we will get stopped by stop loss. This is normal because we don't know when the trend will be ended. We just follow the trend.

     

    This is really a good system for me at all. Thanks again to waterskiguy.

×
×
  • Create New...