josephR

No complaint from Norton on my system. Here is what you get for $1k:

18 period Bollinger Bands with 2 & 1.8 Std Devs.,

5,3,3 Stochastics,

Volume w/ Regression line (?)

very simple support/resistance!!

And many false signals...

Since these are (for the most part) freely available, it must be those training videos that make it worth the big bucks ;-)

josephr

I believe that the Ocean software was written for windows XP and Tradestation 8 and that is the reason you are not able to load it on W7, my advise since computers are so cheap, is you should get a 2nd computer, XP since most of the older programs were written for XP, Ocean software is a $8000 software so it would be worth to invest in getting a 2nd computer

I think you are right and it would be a wise investment! I am on it already.

Best,

jR

Why did you jump on the bacon like mouse? Win XP professional have no limitation. Win 7 is anyway a BS just to make it not compatible with many software's to let you reach in your pocket deeper! Serving your idol Bill Gates? Rich will be richer?

Hermes

Mouse on bacon? Bill Gates the idol? Thanks.

When (and if) you buy a new machine, it comes with win7. And some of us have to choose our battles carefully. Obviously, you don't!

jR

Anyone having luck with 64bit win7 installation?

Keygen requires formal installation, or so it seems.

jR

Mirror for OBP1Lock32test.exe and OBP1Lock32x.dll :

http://[email protected]/archive/5rQQNsev/OBP1Lock32x.html

" (mirror it, please, in case I die or something ):"

Hey udc, you are much needed here, please don't die ;-)

Yes. The code, as was written for MT4 by someone else (and I don't know how close or far it is from the original Jurik's software), does use some variables which are initialized only once at the very beginning and then they are just modified as the calculations progress. I didn't examine the logic much but at the first glance it seemed to me like it was calculating some error and as more bars are calculated the error is lesser and lesser. But that's just my wild guess and the reality may be totally different. Now the problem with Metatrader is that the last two bars are recalculated at every tick. Thus if my assumption was correct then this whole error calculation would get logically broken because for the same bar the error (and thus the resulting indicator value) would be different every time. That's why I simply reset all those values and calculate everything from the beginning at every new tick, that way it can't end up with different values. I know it's lame but I wanted to get it done fast and move forward.

I think you are onto something! It treats tick values as a stream of data (series) so it does not have any notion of whether that tick is in the middle of the bar or at the close. Obviously this is very different with historical series which is just the bar closes and missing all the interim ticks.

[[The more confusing bit is that the same logic, once used with the RSX series in the "JMA of RSX" seems to produce results the are very consistent in rt vs historical!! RSX values certainly change within each bar just as closes do in each tick, yet results are consistent both in MT4 and eSignal. There is got to be an easy explanation but it is evading me now! ]] Update: it does do as JMA albeit harder to see!

BTW, thank you so much for the this fantastic volume of work you have produced and generously shared.

You are an inspiration to us all.

Keep up the great work,

josephR

The JMA code I could find here and on TSD repaint in the sense that real time JMA is very different from historical JMA. Just let JMA run on a 1M chart for a few minutes and then open another 1M chart and add same period JMA and you will see what I mean. Did I rediscover the obvious, or am I missing something? I looked at JMA_SL (StarLight) from TSD and saw some code that seemed like it was trying to preserve some variables across ticks, but even that does repaint.

Anyone cares to set me straight? Or point me to the the RT version, pls?

@udc, I noticed you were recalculating JMA across all bars on every tick in your JMA function, is that to take care of this situation?

Any help is appreciated. I am trying to port these to esignal and that is where I ran into this and was wondering if this is a bug or a feature!

josephR

FWIW, the swing indicator is nothing but MACD Histo(48, 104, 9), and the scalper is MACD Histo(7, 10, 5).

josephR

do anybody have tried it in windows 7 64bit ? the application just throw out some error messages and wont run

I cannot run it on win7/64bit either.

Another Server

Here is another server:

http://connectpro58377496.adobeconnect.com/p3uzd4smey7/

Other recorded webinars by Barry on the same site:

http://www.mirusfutures.com/search/node/burns

Enjoy!

jR

Well, if everyone who makes money with the system, also gets a refund, there wont be much of an incentive for the author to produce the update, is there? This is like killing the goose that lays the golden egg!!

C0py, while I appreciate your spirit of sharing, I personally prefer to reward those who do honest work and make me money! Morality aside, I consider it as good investment.

jR

This is an attempt at catching a pullback in a trend. I was intrigued so I coded a quick indi to test the signal quality visually:

!RI-TrendSetter-sig.ex4

Lets say I am not impressed! Your mileage might vary!

josephR

Non Repainting RSIEMA

vx13,

one simple way to tame real time signals of a repainting indicator without deciphering its exact algo is to create another (simple) indicator that calls on the first one on every tick and 'captures' the output at the time of the call so if the original indicator goes back a few bars and changes things, that has no effect on the new indicator***. This does not work for historical data.

Usually the resulting signals are pretty lame when repainting is "disabled" and I don't think this is any different.

I have coded such indicator. You can take it for a spin and let us know what you think. Again, remember that this is good for forward real time testing as the past will be the same for both. To avoid interference in case you want to run both indicators on the same chart for comparison, I am using squares (aqua/yellow) in place of arrows on the chart. Make sure the original indicator is in the same directory.

RumiRSIEMA-nrp.ex4

Enjoy!

josephR

***You can also change the original indicator so it calls itself w/ modified options to the same effect, but you have to understand what the indicator is doing and it is more complicated. This happens to be a simple one but the solution is generic.

Josephr, what are the colors the bars need to be for a strong sell? both salmon?

 

And if they are both light green then it is a strong buy, right?

gctex, with the default settings, the second line is the signal at the next higher time frame and your interpretation is correct.

JosephR, which is your latest Rumi RSI indicator? I've been downloading so many indicators and templates from this thread it is kind of confusing now.

 

I wish someone would just update the first post with waterskiguy's original stuff, followed by later additions.

#327 still has the valid link to the latest Rumi Rsi inidcator. Here it the link for your convenience: http://[email protected]/file/YDC1ipVQ/RumiRSISignal-v2.html

josephR

Joseph do you know what the difference is between this method and the one that Steve Mauro teaches? Or is it the same and Martin was a student of Steve's or something its unlikely both hit upon the same idea independently.

Sorry, Hermanhess. I don't know enough about either to give you an informed opinion. I watched a webinar by Steve and Martin's online teaser videos. Steve's appearance here at the forum has left a bad imprint and I don't care for his sneaky/aggressive traits. I think both are exploiting Spot Market behaviors we all have observed. Whether they have the right methodology to counter those profitably, remains to be seen. In Vegas, they sell you books on "How To Beat the Dealer..." right in the casinos! I have a feeling there is a parallel here ;-)

josephR

fxnizar, posting the annotated pic was a great idea. Thanks very much.

I wish we could blow it up a bit to get better details. It is certainly very helpful for those of us new to this system.

I encourage others to follow suit.

Best,

josephR

[Req] MartiinCol3's newest DVD release!

Here is the code:

hxxp://learningt0trade.c0m/one-on-one-trader-training/

He has just released his latest DVD set which is tenth the price of his 1 on 1 course and should be interesting. I think it should be better than Steve Mauro (locally known as fxArch3r http://indo-investasi.com/images/smilies/winking.gif!). But I would like a peek before spending my money.

So, please share if and when you get it.

Many thanks,

josephR

You need 15 posts before the Thanks button appears before the "Reputation" button.

Good luck, Parviz khaan ;-)

My understanding is that you can only access values that are "returned" to mq4 via one of the indicator buffers. The index of the buffer you are interested in is specified in the "Mode" parameter of the iCustom call. Otherwise, the values are local to the indi and I dont think there is any way of getting to them thru the iCustom call, or any other way for that matter (****).

A decompile of the iProfitTracker reveals that no indicator buffers are used, so all calculated values are local to the indi.

That said, you can modify the indi, add one or more indicator buffer(s), and write the value you are interested in to the buffer whenever it is calculated. Given that you are writing a new indi, I trust you should have no problem doing that.

****: As @Hacker correctly mentions below, the other way of passing variables between indis is thru the use of global variables!

I already posted the pdf link and here is the mod 1 video.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/etvideos/Mod1_final_v2.swf

 

Although there are 6 mods but you can download only the mod 1 for now.

Here is what I get:

AccessDeniedAccess DeniedEB934E6DBCA79D2CkdmMqirSzfJnOUL7KWCXyHwqZ0nEPd9k6vam+WrcttZnwNRFPHN/iSXhTZ0oqD1o

Looks like you joined us just in time to tell us that. Now, that is very nice of you. Talk about Synchronicity ;-)

Can your friend recommend to this people to add a trial period to their s/w?

What about SuperADX,josephR?Can you tell us more about it's logic?

Well, I can certainly make an attempt. It is not as straight forward as trendwave, so patience is called for!

First, the Money line is an 89 period lwma. code attempts to find places where change in trend strength will signal a reversion to mean or what he calls the money line.

It would be educational to just drop the "SupportingADX" which is called on by Super ADX on the chart and note places where the line crosses up/down the 35 level and 10 and peaks and bottoms.

Now for the details:

-SupportingADX:

you can view price movement as the vector sum of a push up vector and a pull down vector. One way to measure the strength of each component is to find the ratio of the respective move over max movement in either direction. Another words: high (low) of this period -high (low) of last period over max movement (either bar range, or current high or low relative to last close). If you take the abs value of the difference in strength, and smooth that over a 14 period average, as the difference increases one side or the other is winning and when it stops and flips, then chances are directional movement will slow and flip as well.

SuperADX:

SuperADX looks at a few "flips" or changes in direction to arrive at its conclusions. One is the flip in trend strength as above. The other one is a simple macd flip over its signal line and another is a flip in the acceleration (second MA) of deviation of typical price ( (h + l + c)/3) to its exp average. Another is number of flips in the past 16 bars!

Depending on which occurs and if flips happen at the same time or in isolation, different signals are generated.

For example, a red bar is generated when the trend strength flips from a very lethargic (less than 10) position, signalling strength will come into price movement in either direction.

Or a white bar is generated signalling end of trend when a strong (>35) trend strength

flips down. A few of these in a row, probability of a reversal is much higher as directional strength is negated by the opposing force multiple times.

I am not sure if I have made it any clearer, but I hope this gives you an idea of what the code is doing. I would welcome others to add or correct.

Happy trading,

josephR