I often read two different versions about this rule:
1. Wave 4 doesn't have to overlap the range territory of Wave 1
2. Wave 4 doesn't have to overlap the range territory of Wave 2
and these two versions doesn't mean the same thing, since if Wave 2 is an expanded flat its "range territory" goes well above the end of Wave 1.
If Wave 4 overlaps the final part of Wave B of an expanded flat is still the wave count correct?
So I am asking which one is the correct version of EWT rule about Wave 4 (I think #1)
1. Wave 4 doesn't have to overlap the range territory of Wave 1
2. Wave 4 doesn't have to overlap the range territory of Wave 2
and these two versions doesn't mean the same thing, since if Wave 2 is an expanded flat its "range territory" goes well above the end of Wave 1.
If Wave 4 overlaps the final part of Wave B of an expanded flat is still the wave count correct?
So I am asking which one is the correct version of EWT rule about Wave 4 (I think #1)
Comment